by iampunha | 10/07/2008 08:00:00 AM
They left him tied to a fence, beaten to within inches of his life.

A few days later, those inches had become an inch, the inch tenths, the tenths fading into immeasurability and the measure of a man unconscious in a hospital.

"Doctors said [his] skull was so badly fractured they couldn't operate; an autopsy showed he received 18 severe blows to the head and bruises to his groin and inner thighs. Shepard also suffered a massive brain stem injury."

Faced with this ... inhuman act, this barbarism of cold and calculating measure, show me the father who would not have lashed out at his son's alleged murderers, the mother who would have looked at the accused, then the accuseds' parents, and asked if this was how they had raised their sons.

Instead, their determination and legacy, now 10 years after their son was beaten to within inches of his life and left to die in the frozen air of Wyoming, can be summarized by the two words on a purple bracelet that has adorned my left wrist for more than 2 1/2 years:

Erase hate.



For the nameless victims of hate crimes, from lynchings in the South to those gay-bashed everywhere.

And for those they left behind.


Erase hate.

That's how Matthew Shepard's mother, Judy, reacted to her son's murder. Matthew Shepard died Oct. 12, 1998, five days after two men (and I use the term biologically, not culturally) beat him and left him to die.

And Dennis Shepard, Matt's father:

By the end of the beating, his body was just trying to survive. You left him out there by himself, but he wasn’t alone. There were his lifelong friends with him—friends that he had grown up with. You’re probably wondering who these friends were. First, he had the beautiful night sky with the same stars and moon that we used to look at through a telescope. Then, he had the daylight and the sun to shine on him one more time—one more cool, wonderful autumn day in Wyoming. His last day alive in Wyoming. His last day alive in the state that he always proudly called home. And through it all he was breathing in for the last time the smell of Wyoming sagebrush and the scent of pine trees from the snowy range. He heard the wind—the ever-present Wyoming wind—for the last time. He had one more friend with him. One he grew to know through his time in Sunday school and as an acolyte at St. Mark’s in Casper as well as through his visits to St. Matthew’s in Laramie. He had God.

I feel better knowing he wasn’t alone.


Erase hate. Even through the ultimate tragedy of their child's murder, the Shepards reacted with dignity and pride.



Some months ago, higher-ups from New York came to visit my workplace to see how things were going. I'm told they visit every year or two, so this was a nontrivial event.

I had planned to wear a long-sleeved shirt to work that day. I usually wear long sleeves; they keep the office so cold that I start getting sick if I'm not sufficiently covered.

I had every reason in the world to wear a long-sleeved shirt that day, in particular because of the chance that one of the higher-ups would see my bracelet and know what it was -- or not.

So of course I forgot and wore a short-sleeved shirt.

And on the second sweep-by of those higher-ups, one of them asked what that purple thing was on my wrist.

Oh.
SHIT.

See, being from New York doesn't mean you are professionally pro-gay or even neutral. It can mean that, but I try not to assume anything (and am often pleasantly surprised).

So I said, as "water is wet" matter-of-factly, "A bracelet."

"Could I see it?"

As I took it off, I debated turning it inside-out just in case the glance was cursory.

Mid-takeoff, I decided no. Screw that. If I'm going down for a fucking bracelet, I'm going down with those nine capital letters -- "ERASE HATE" -- and the Web site, www.MathewShepard.org, in full view. Someone doesn't like it? Fine. In a market that ain't great for print media, throw money at a lawsuit and a replacement for me (and not as good a worker, if I do say so myself).

The man in the suit looked at the bracelet, turned it over in his hands, then gave it back to me.

"Thank you," he said slowly enough and with enough eye contact that ... I think he got it.

I think he understood exactly what that bracelet means. Did he for sure? I'll probably never know. Maybe he just is a nice guy who appreciated that I showed it to him, and he just noticed it because, hello, it's purple on Irish white (actually mildly tan, largely because of freckles).

Or maybe he knew. I think he did. It's not as famous a bracelet as the livestrong or wriststrong ones, but it's a distinctive color, and anyone who was media-aware in 1998 knows who Matthew Shepard is and was.

I like to think he knew, and I like to think someone close to him has a very good (and very peaceful) reason for him to know. Maybe he's got a gay kid or other close relative. Perhaps some invaluable employee who took him under their wing many years ago later confided something that gave him a change of heart.

Perhaps, maybe, I wonder if.

And maybe not, but the body language suggested otherwise, and pretty strongly so.



Ten years later, we are erasing hate. My remaining grandparent (excusing my wife's grandfather and step-grandmother, who don't know or at least haven't been told) was born 20+ years before Truman integrated the military (and Eisenhower later enforced it) and couldn't be less concerned with my sexuality or her niece Bridget's (or that niece's partner) than she currently is.

Ten years later, my younger brother has a T-shirt with three marriage icons -- one het, two gay -- and the words "It's all good."

Cried when I saw that shirt.



But 10 years later, we still lack adequate hate-crime legislation. The Matthew Shepard Act will likely be passed next year, and conservatives and bigots across the country will all be highly offended that this infringes upon their religious expression.

So let me say this as kindly and lovingly as I can:

This is not a heated debate on the place of religious expression in the public square. This is a heated debate over, of all things, the right of religion to justify assault and MURDER.

If your God is such a pathetic piece of shit that he (or she) advocates hating other people to their death because they don't love the right adults, that's your problem, not mine.

And if you honestly have a problem existing near me because I am different, go back to the beginning of that sentence.

YOU have a problem.

And while you so much do not want to come after me -- before we moved, I lifted weights when I was bored, and I benched 400 pounds -- you want even less to be made a national figure of hate, an example of why we need hate crime legislation so you really have to think four or five or 50 times about beating the shit out of some masculine-looking woman who says, after several promptings, each less romantic than the last, that she won't date you, but she'd go for your ex-girlfriend. (Oh, and any such violence would probably further galvanize the movement for harsher punishment for you and yours.)

And if your religion would defend that action, that violence, the laws of civility and peace absolutely should trump the laws of intolerance and bigotry.

For that matter, if your religion supports spreading hate of any sort, what exactly are you getting out of it? Superiority over other people? Yeah, boy, what an equality-loving Sunday morning that must be. "Blessed are we, who are way the hell better than those evildoers. God is not mocked." Give me your tired, your poor, your ... straight, white Christians. (Give me "Republican National Convention attendees" for $100, Alex.)

Or you could be like my father, who is thoroughly Catholic and thoroughly my father, and doesn't see how any love is spread by telling people they're going to hell, let alone thinking you're so secure in your after-life station that you can begin assessing other people's. Really? You're so set that you can begin junior-modding heaven?



Dennis Shepard again:

Matt’s beating, hospitalization, and funeral focused worldwide attention on hate. Good is coming out of evil. People have said “Enough is enough.” You screwed up, Mr. McKinney. You made the world realize that a person’s lifestyle is not a reason for discrimination, intolerance, persecution, and violence. This is not the 1920s, 30s, and 40s of Nazi Germany. My son died because of your ignorance and intolerance. I can’t bring him back. But I can do my best to see that this never, ever happens to another person or another family again. As I mentioned earlier, my son has become a symbol—a symbol against hate and people like you; a symbol for encouraging respect for individuality; for appreciating that someone is different; for tolerance. I miss my son, but I’m proud to be able to say that he is my son.




Labels:

 
by iampunha | 10/01/2008 08:00:00 AM
Fifteen years ago, give or take a few, I walked into my grade school library. The librarian was new, and I was curious.

But in the way children are curious about what their parents and other people's parents did, I was curious about what her parents did.

"My father," she told me, "was a lawyer at the Nuremberg trials. For the prosecution."

I had little idea what these things were. I had some clue of what the prosecution was (its function within the justice system), but the Nuremberg trials?

"After the war, some of the Nazi leadership was put on trial for war crimes. And my father helped convict them."



For Sir Richard Harris, Walter Mathau and Jimmy Carter, born on Oct. 1 1920, 1924 and 1930, respectively.

It was not so long after I found out that Mrs. Frank's father had prosecuted war criminals that other pieces of that story happened into my life.

In eighth grade, we studied World War II. Part of that experience involved reading Night; I put it off until the last minute, expecting (because it was assigned) that it would be boring, and I ended up reading every fucking page of that book in one night.

Not skimming, reading. I felt a connection to Elie — that's how I thought of him then, as a teenager in a concentration camp, with me in a hellish school setting I thought was as bad, on some levels, as his setting. (We asked the same questions, were reviled for situations beyond our control, and questioned the being supposedly with a plan in spite of all of this.)

As another part of that unit on World War II, a woman in her 70s came to talk to us about the Holocaust.

As in, what it was like.

As in, to survive when such a man as Hitler is trying to kill you.

She spoke with a fairly thick accent, such that to understand her, you had to focus pretty intently on her.

That wasn't so hard. With the story she told,

time
stopped.

And while time stopped, she was not a 70-year-old woman with a thick accent talking to us about the 1940s.

She was a 20-year-old woman trying to survive in the dead of winter in a German concentration camp.

Those whom famine, disease and random acts of active destruction (as opposed to the passive destruction of starvation) had not killed were forced to march. For how long, I do not remember. But I remember that she told us her father had told her that when they began to march, she was to wear her ski boots.

I did not then understand how she could have secured her ski boots, but I was glad she had. For, as she told us that day, "Girls to my left and right were snapping their toes off like twigs in the foot-thick snow. But I had my ski boots on, so my feet were saved."

That image -- that sound -- how that becomes not a nightmare but a memory ... I hope nobody ever has to come to terms with. Because as she told this story, it was as a nightmare. It was as a fact of life, another part of the horrific redefining of reality in the 1940s for so many millions of people (many of them Jewish, many of them not).



While researching another diary, I remembered this event. I always remembered that I'd met a Holocaust survivor, but I didn't remember much about her except that she was, to my uneducated self, fatter than I had expected. (The reasoning behind this is as irrelevant as it is irrelevant.) And I remember asking my mother shortly thereafter why she would be fat and not skinny, as she had been during her time in the Holocaust. And being allowed to ask that question, and not being shunned, is as important as is the answer. We do not understand the tough elements of how we work unless we ask the awkward questions.

My mother, with the patience of ... a very patient person, explained to me that people who have lost everything, who grew up without much, or who have been through very traumatic events tend to hoard, and that includes food.

(Years later, I am seeing the same thing happen to my parents, and to me. We are none of us gaining weight, but throwing things away is very hard. How do you know you will never need it again?)

Many years later, I remembered the bit about the ski boots. And that, some months ago, was enough to find her then. And I have not forgotten her since.

And now, neither will you.

Ladies and gentlemen, Gerda Weissmann Klein.

This is what I mean when I say Elie Wiesel won.

Gerda Weissmann Klein came to my city last month to help promote a reading campaign. The book selected for the One City, One Book program was "All But My Life." I regret very, very deeply that I wasn't able to see her again and thank her for ... frankly, what she has been to me and to humanity. I am only happy that other people have a deeper appreciation for their lives because of hers, and she because of how theirs were moved by her.



Some of the men who tried to kill Gerda Weissmann Klein (my writing style is such that I often use last names after first reference, but I don't normally do that with people like Holocaust victims because they are names now where once they were numbers), and who did kill her friends and relatives, were sentenced 62 years ago today to die for their crimes.

Of the 24 indicted in the first (and more famous) Nuremberg Trials, 12 were sentenced to death. One more killed himself before the trial began, and a 14th was alive in name only (senile and bedridden) a few years before the trial began.

One was acquitted in the first trial but not in a subsequent. Another was acquitted and lived his life in relative peace. And the third was an economist whose story is worth telling another day. You probably haven't heard of him. You undoubtedly should.

So that leaves us with seven men. Two got 20 years, one 15 years, one 10 years and the remaining three life in prison, which was only 11 years for one, nine for another and 41 for Rudolph Hess, who gradually became a sympathy case among some U.S. and foreign politicians because he was insane. (Those of you who don't like Nixon much may find yourselves liking him even less after finding out that he was in favor of releasing Hess.)

Sixty-two years ago today, 12 men were sentenced to die for their crimes.

They and their cohorts were responsible for the murders of between 9 and 11 million people.

Justice? Not for me to decide, I think. But I'm not sure there can be adequate justice in a court of law following such destruction.

Sixty-two years after the first of the Nuremberg Trials ended, Nazi is a bad word, Hitler is reviled by the most educated and the most ignorant, and Holocaust denial is a crime in many European countries.

Justice? It seems to me, from what I have read on the Holocaust and its victims and survivors, that justice is inched closer to when we do not stop talking about what happened, do not let people grow up without knowing what happened.

Justice, in this case, is about reliving history on your own terms so it doesn't become the past on someone else's.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 9/30/2008 08:00:00 AM
Shlomo and Sarah already have two girls, Hilda and Beatrice (Bea).

For Schlomo, life is about his two daughters, yes, but his community, as well, and his shop, where Sarah also works.

But Sarah was also pregnant -- very pregnant. And 80 years ago today, she gives birth to baby Eliezer, Schlomo's first and only son. The family will grow to six with the birth of Tzipora in 1937, but for those first nine years, Eliezer is the baby of the family.

But his parents do not treat him as one. Schlomo works very hard at the family store and in the community, spending significant time with his son only on the Sabbath. Eliezer too works hard, learning languages and studying his culture and its history, urged on by his father to learn the present and his mother to learn the past and the faith.

What had been at least a moderately stable family life descends, at first slowly, into survival. Their town, in the Transylvania region of Romania, is ceded first to Hungary when Tzipora is 3, then back to Romania four years later.



For Tzipora, Schlomo and Sarah, and for the millions more we wait to meet, should we be so lucky.

And then Eliezer is tattooed for transport to Auschwitz.

All the study Eliezer has done, all the devotion to books and his faith, will now undergo the ultimate test. For the 15-year-old, it will be a struggle to keep his body alive, but also to keep his mind alive.



Ironically, it is perhaps because of this death sentence that the teenager survives that year, let alone what is to come:


After six months of intensive study, repetition of incantations, and ascetic exercises, the oldest of the three students [studying the Kabala with a Kabalist], Yiddele, fell inexplicably ill. He lost his power of speech, his will to live, and subsided into what seemed to be a near-catatonic state. Psychologists and neurologists were consulted, prayers were said, but to no avail. Yiddele never recovered. After another interval, the second student, Sruli, fell ill, with similar symptoms.

[...]

[Eliezer] says that he was sure that had the Germans not entered Sighet [his hometown, where he lived] the following spring in 1944, he would have suffered the same fate as his two comrades. "Thus it was the killers who 'saved' me," he says now with deep irony. "Woe unto me, it is to them that I owe the fact that I was spared."




The young scholar is transported from a life of schoolbooks and learning languages (Yiddish, Hungarian, Romanian and German) with a father not often present in the home and even less often sentimental or loving, to a life with his father.

And, now surrounded by fellow Jews and the threat of slow and painful death, only his father.

Schlomo and his only son are soon separated from Sarah and the girls. They will never see Sarah or Tzipora again.



Now transported from a potentially dangerous religious setting to a "just live" setting, Elie was an adolescent with the hormones of an adolescent, but also finally alone with his father, but also now being punished for being a Jew.

The starvation, the disease, the fetid conditions, ... but the prayers before meals.

The murder, the gas, the unannounced executions, ... but the survival.

The hate, the tattoos, the scapegoating, ... but the trial of God, just to humanize the people being treated as animals:


For many Jews in Auschwitz that thought came to them in blinding rushes, not as piety (God suffering as a human being), nor as a poetic reflection of man's inhumanity to man. Wiesel found himself the youngest witness to an amazing "trial" one evening in which three fellow concentration camp inmates, rabbinical scholars, actually "sued"—to use Wiesel's own words—God. They asked Him to answer why He had allowed such indescribable suffering to happen to His own people. Later, Wiesel developed this profound and anguished questioning into a play, The Trial of God, which transposes the "trial" he himself witnessed to a Jewish community in Shamgorod, the Ukraine, after an actual pogrom in 1649.


The trial of God, and then the prayers to God after the trial, as that book attests:

"Yes, we practiced religion even in a death camp," he wrote. "I said my prayers every day."


The prayers continued through 1944, even as his father, Schlomo, descended further into death with every passing, bitterly cold day. Dysentery, forced marches, starvation and marches West, away from the front, where the Nazis were losing.

And on January 29, 1945, eight months, one week and six days after deportation to Auschwitz began, Schlomo Wiesel died from "dystentery, starvation, and exhaustion" and was burned in a crematorium:

He and Elie had somehow stuck together for the seven months they had been in Auschwitz and had even survived the nightmarish evacuation to the West. But though he was seriously ill, the medical staff considered him too far gone to bother trying to keep alive. Even in his last few hours, animal-like neighbors on the boarded bunks stole from him the last crumbs of bread and soup. At night he was still barely alive, but by dawn, when Wiesel awoke he had died and they already had dragged his body away. "I did not weep," Wiesel wrote in Night, "and it painted me that I could not weep. But I had no more tears."


And 16-year-old Elie Wiesel was alone.



A few months later, he was free. Buchenwald was free.

He was, as many Jews who had survived the Holocaust, a child with both parents dead. So he went where one might expect: an orphanage.

A chance photograph of Wiesel with other young orphans in a French newspaper brought him back into contact with his sisters. His eldest sister, Hilda, who had married another camp survivor, had moved to Paris to live. She had seen Elie's picture in a newspaper article about the orphans and contacted the orphanage director. The following day she and Elie met in Paris and embraced in mutual anguish. She told him that Bea, Elie's other sister, was also alive, but was living in a Displaced Person's Camp in Kassel, Germany.


The rest of the journey from there to here is long. From how much Wiesel struggled in his youth, and from the damage done to him in the Holocaust, one might well expect that.

Throughout these struggles, Wiesel's focus has been humanity, his education and the education of those around him. He enrolled in the Sorbonne. He worked as a journalist.

As a journalist, a stage in Wiesel's life developed that has since taken the world by storm:

One day, providentially, as he thought, he attended a reception at the Israeli Embassy in Paris and ran into France's most recent Nobel laureate for literature, François Mauriac. At last, Wiesel thought to himself, a chance to get to Mendès-France. Mauriac and he were known to be very close. Affably, Mauriac agreed to an interview with the young reporter and set a day and a time. A devout Roman Catholic whose behavior during the German occupation had been impeccable, he was used to being interviewed on his past, on literature, and on events in contemporary French political life. He was an expert on this too. He didn't know that Wiesel only wanted to use him as a slingshot to get to Mendès-France.

Wiesel showed up nervous and chain-smoking at the appointed time at Mauriac's Paris apartment. The older man was gracious and quickly put Wiesel at his ease. Instead of sitting back to receive the reporter's questions, through, he began to speak with even greater passion about his favorite topic, Jesus Christ. He spoke warmly about his feelings toward Israel, toward the Jews in general, a people, he said who had been martyrs throughout history. For Mauriac, Wiesel noticed with some irritation, it was as though everything in creation had some connection to Jesus.

"Every reference led back to him," Wiesel wrote in one of his earliest accounts of the meeting. "Jerusalem? The eternal city," Wiesel describes Mauriac as continuing, "where Jesus turned his disciples into apostles. The Bible? The Old Testament, which thanks to Jesus of Nazareth, succeeded in enriching itself with a New Testament. Mendez-France? A Jew both brave and hated, not unlike Jesus a long time ago. ..." As for Jesus, Wiesel wrote later, "when [Mauriac] spoke his name, his smile seemed to turn inward. Once started, he had no wish to change the subject."

The monologue, however eloquent and fascinating it was, finally triggered something off in Wiesel. All of his anger at Christian anti-Semitism over the centuries, his own accumulated grief from Sighet, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald, suddenly boiled over. He closed his notebook and stood up angrily. "Sir," he said to the still-seated Mauriac,

You speak of Christ. Christians love to speak of him. The passion of Christ, the agony of Christ, the death of Christ. In your religion, that is all you speak of. Well, I want you to know that ten years ago, not very far from here, I knew Jewish children every one of whom suffered a thousand times more, six million times more, than Christ on the cross. And we don't speak about them. Can you understand that, sir? We don't speak about them.


Mauriac went pale. He said nothing, but still seated on the sofa with a woolen blanket around him, he gazed back at Wiesel, as if expecting to hear more. But Wiesel was already on the way out, closing the apartment door after him and pressing the buzzer for the elevator.

The door behind him quietly opened again, and there was Mauriac, gently taking Wiesel's arm and asking him to come back into the apartment once more. After they had both sat down without saying anything else, Muriac began to weep, still looking at Wiesel, but engulfed in grief. For a long time the tears simply streamed down his face. Wiesel began to feel remorse for his own rudeness and harshness.

Wiesel wanted to apologize, but Mauriac wouldn't let him. Instead, he wanted to know everything about Wiesel's experience, his parents, the trains, the camps. He asked why Wiesel had not written all of this down. Wiesel told him about his vow to remain silent for ten years. Mauriac wanted to know about this too. Then, escorting him back to the elevator, he told the much younger man, "I think that you are wrong. You are wrong not to speak. ... Listen to the old man that I am: one must speak out—one must also speak out."

[...]

"The fact is that, practically, I owe Francois Mauriac my career," Wiesel has said. "He was a Christian, and we were very close friends. Had it not been for Mauriac, I would have become or remained an obscure writer, a journalist." "I owe him a lot," Wiesel freely admits about Mauriac. "I don't know how I would have fared without Mauriac. He kept a watchful eye on my literary efforts." Very specifically, it was to Mauriac that Wiesel first sent the manuscript of Night in its first French edition (La Nuit), a year after their first meeting. It was to become the launching pad of Wiesel's rapid rise to international fame as a writer.


Since the late 1950s, and particularly since the 1960s, words have flowed out of Elie Wiesel like water flowing to the sea. As with many fellow survivors, what had been a time of deeply conflicted emotions (to put it, frankly, embarrassingly mildly) with God, combined with the physical, emotional and psychological realities of the Holocaust, have given us a man who could very easily have become permanently lost at any point before his road to personal satisfaction became a highway of information from which he has, and gratefully so for humanity, never exited.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeyzOvWQzFI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ucu94QAi4dA

Elie Wiesel Goes Home


Night (warning: graphic)




Elie Wiesel won. He won, and we have won because of him.

And today's winner celebrates his 80th birthday today.

May the lessons of today inform the decisions of tomorrow.

And may there be peace in his, and your, heart.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 9/29/2008 07:51:00 AM
A lot of really important things have happened on Sept. 29s.

Remember our old friend Chief Justice Roberts? Confirmed three years ago today.

Miguel de Cervantes was born many Sept. 29s ago. Enrico Fermi, Gene Autry and Stan Berenstain as well, though more recently.

I could write you a lovely, heartfelt reflective diary on Larry Linville -- and since as of writing this intro, the body is untouched, don't expect I won't. Born on Sept. 29, 1939, and died seven years ago.

Ray Ewry died Sept. 29, 1937, and we all ought to know more about a man who won eight gold medals at the Olympic Games from 1900 to 1908. W.H. Auden, Casey Stengel and Chas Adams also died many years ago today, Adams most recently (1988).

But none of them could catch today's honoree.


For love of the game.

Willie Mays and The Catch (pt.2 of 2)


I settled on Willie Mays' catch in the 1954 World Series not because it was the best catch ever made. Was it? One of the most important catches ever made, sure. Best? Mays slows down at the end there. He isn't blind to the ball's flight; he's adjusting to it. He knows exactly where he is and exactly what he's doing.

Best catch? It looked sensational, perhaps by design and perhaps by necessity; why turn around to catch the ball if you're where you want to be? You can get more momentum, and thus more oomph on the ball for the throw back to the infield to keep the tagging runners honest, if you keep your back to the infield and then spin for the throw.

Best catch? I'm happy to have that argument all day long. Means I get to watch that play and others like it. And gosh, what a horrible day of baseball analysis that would be, huh? Having to look at the best do their best? What grueling, unhappy work.



I read online news sources at work a lot (lot of free time; I've written plenty of articles for this place there too), so I don't gain a hell of a lot from videos. With the sound turned up to the max on my machine, I can barely hear anything. So for the benefit of those who can't do sound (or can't do it well), or who can't hear (or can't hear well), here's what George F. Will says:


Willie Mays was not the first black ballplayer, but he had his own barrier to break through, a kind of gentle, good-natured racism, but racism nonetheless. Remember, when he came up, people would say, "What an instinctive ballplayer he is. What a natural ballplayer he is. What childlike enthusiasm."

Well, 30 years on, we can hear, with our better-trained ears, the racism in that.

He was wonderfully gifted, yes. Great natural gifts, yes. But no one ever got to the major leagues -- no one got to the major league -- on natural gifts without an awful lot of refining work.

Sure he was a great instinctive ballplayer, but he was also a tremendously smart ballplayer. As a rookie, he'd get to second base, watch two batters come to the plate, and he would go back to the dugout having stolen the signs and decoded the sequence, he'd know the indicator sign from the other signs.

Willie Mays, natural ballplayer, sure.

Hardest-working ballplayer y'ever saw.




I know what many of you are thinking. Replace Mays with Obama and baseball strategy with political strategy and you have a real comparison.

Go right ahead. I certainly won't stop you. I don't know what Mays or Obama would say to that. (Obama would probably defer to the man who was, until the advent of designer steroids and drugs for which no detection test exists, the third greatest home run hitter in the history of the majors.)

I'll even help you out a little. The argument from the Right is that Obama is just elite, having graduated from Harvard and Columbia, having gained international stardom and acclaim in a celebrity-crazed culture.

Single mother. Kansas. Biracial before that was cool. Poor.

Yes, he has tremendous natural gifts. Yes, he clearly loves interacting with people and helping them. Yes, there is a joy to watching him with his family on the political stage that you simply don't see from many people. That smile is not pasted on; it's his actual emotion.

You do not become president of the Harvard Law Review because you coast through anything.

Forget first black anything. Forget black anything.

There have been a little more than 109 presidents of the Harvard Law Review.

You do not become president of the Harvard Law Review because you are just naturally smart. Even if you are black and naturally smart.

You do not get into Harvard Law School because you are naturally smart. Even if you are black and naturally smart.

You do not get into Columbia because you are naturally smart unless you are so naturally smart that you do not need to study anything. And since Obama is not a super genius -- he is very booksmart, and he learns very, very quickly, but he is not and has never been the kind of person who just knows the material, and that's all there is to it.

You do not get very far in politics if you cannot rally your base, if you cannot legislate effectively, if you cannot play the game (or change its rules to those you find more useful), if, if, if.

It takes more than hard work and natural appeal. John Edwards is a lawyer, and he has tons of natural appeal.

And he lost.

Hillary Clinton is smart and fierce. Fierce. But it's a good fierce, not a scary fierce. I've gotten the sense with her that she'll work harder for a penny than she will for a dollar because there is pride to be had in working to glorify work.

But she lost.

It isn't just what you have. And it isn't just how hard you're willing to work. It's how well you can use what you are and what you know to make yourself better. It's how efficiently you improve yourself. Yes, you can learn, but can you learn what you need in time?

A few nights ago, we found out the answer to that question.



Two more points.

First, the Giants were playing the Cleveland Indians in that World Series.

The Indians had demolished the competition in 1954. Simply punished it. Their 111 wins were bested only in 1998, in a schedule that had eight more games (and massively weaker competition, I think, because of expansion). They were ridiculous.

The game is tied, 2-2, and up walks Vic Wertz, who will hit .500 in tue series. For those who don't know, that's kind of insane. These days, hitting .300 is pretty good, and anything close to .400 is ridiculous. Hitting .500 in the World Series is nuts. Wertz had 16 at-bats and eight hits.

Wertz is up with runners on first and second on in the top of the eighth and no outs. The runner on second is Larry Doby (who integrated the American League), who's pretty fast. Mays is playing shallower than usual to stop Doby from scoring on a single.

Analysts, broadcasters and players have opined since then that if Doby had tagged when the ball was caught, he could have scored from second base, the ball was hit so deep. In other words, that Wertz hit the ball so hard meant the Indians didn't score, on that play or for the rest of the game (which ended with a walk-off home run in the 10th).

The ball would not even have been caught in most stadiums.

No, nothing about the wind or weather. The grass wasn't particularly long, and the lighting was fine (this was in the days before ballgames were played at night so there'd be more revenue).

The thing about old-time stadiums is that they tended to start out pretty big. And while the 483-foot line you see here is well beyond where Wertz's ball landed (in Mays' glove), if that ball is hit in Municipal Stadium, where the Indians played until 1993, Mays is watching that ball clear the center field wall by at least 25 feet. If the Brooklyn Dodgers win the pennant and the game is played in Ebbets Field, it's gone wherever it's hit in fair territory.

It had to be in the Polo Grounds, and it had to be Mays.

I trust the Clinton comparisons go without saying.

Second, Willie Mays was born in 1931. He was 23 and change when he made probably the most famous catch in Major League Baseball history.

Barack Obama is 47. Politically speaking, he is pretty young to be running for president. His star has risen about as fast as has Mays'; Mays' first All-Star game was in his third season.

As Will said in the video above, nobody has ever gotten to the majors without working extremely hard with already-spectacular natural gifts.

And nobody has ever gotten this far in politics without working extremely hard with already-spectacular natural gifts.

And now we wait and see if Jan. 20, 2009, will produce video as pleasing to me as is that of Mays' catch.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 9/03/2008 08:00:00 AM
Benny. Just Benny. Anyone asks, you're Benny, a free seaman. Here are your papers. See? Free colored seaman.

Gotta look calm. Don't look around too much; if you look suspicious, you are suspicious.

Just keep walking. Look straight ahead, quickly to the left and right now, good. Good. Just keep calm, act like this is natural.

It is natural. You ought to be free.

How ... again?

Is that -- no. No. And you're just Benny. Just Benny.

What? Something startle you? No, you just stumbled and were afraid you'd fall. That's all that was. No worries, now.

Just Benny. Got travel orders with your name on them. Yes, sir, here they are. All in order. No, sir, traveling light. Yes, sir. Seat 5A? Thank you, sir.

Just Benny. Benny, the free black seaman, on his way to work in New York.

And freedom.



for e.e. cummings, who died on sept. 3, 1962, but not before giving us a grasshopper.

On Sept. 3, 1838, Frederick Bailey boarded a train with the papers of a man he'd met in Baltimore.

The man had not been robbed of those papers; rather, he'd given them freely to Bailey so the latter could use them to escape to the North.

What awaited Bailey in New York?

Everything.

And nothing.

Freedom. Everything. The chance to marry his love, a free black woman, and start a family no white man could sell or send off to someone else.

No family. Nothing.

Mother? Dead. Father? Identity uncertain, but white, and not in the picture.

Family? Grandmother, back in Maryland. He hadn't seen her in 14 years.

And even if family were trying to find him, he had to change his name to avoid being found by the wrong people.



From these trying roots rose a great orator and speaker. A world traveler. A writer, an activist and a newsman.

All of this while still technically another man's property. And while the man born Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey was in England, his daughter died.

Suddenly, he was an ex-slave, an acclaimed author, a highly sought speaker and consultant and ... in danger of being caught and given back to his old master if, upon his return from overseas, someone spotted him as Frederick Bailey.

While grieving for his daughter, who was 11, he must also be careful not to be captured and returned to life as a slave.



Show me the man -- no, the human being -- who keeps himself composed while having to cut short a European speaking tour because his daughter has just died, and who must also manage to navigate around slave catchers as he returns to a land where slavery is still legal and running away from it is still illegal.



He ran for public office having been on the run from the law for almost 27 years. The Emancipation Proclamation meant he could stop running from Thomas Auld and prepare to run for something.

His running mate couldn't even vote for herself, and she wouldn't have been allowed to take office; she was too young.



Kossacks, I give you Frederick Douglass, whose daring and sense of self are a credit to his American spirit and those who helped him along the way.



Archaeologists Dig into Frederick Douglass' Childhood


(2:38 in is a plaque in place because of my grandfather. Cemetery's cleaned up because of him, too.)

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 9/02/2008 08:08:00 AM
In 1833, your average black American was working in a field, learning about farming, maybe working in someone's home. Certainly not reading or discussing poetry. Things were getting worse in Virginia in the aftermath of Nat Turner's unsuccessful slave revolt.

But in a college in Ohio, blacks would be admitted two years later.

In 1833, your average white female American with good social and/or financial prospects was marrying for money and expected to bear at least a few children. Education beyond household chores, social graces and some foreign languages was, we are so often told, seen as a waste of time.

But in a college in Ohio, women would be admitted four years later.

In an age in which rich white men dominated most of life (and 170 years later, that's still the case in most places in this country), female and black students were bettering themselves in the classroom.

On Sept. 2, 1833, Oberlin College was founded.



For Pierre de Coubertin, who died on Sept. 2, 1937, but not before helping revive the Olympics.

For J.R.R. Tolkien, who died 35 years ago today, and whose legacy informs and guides people from emergent readers to decades-sharpened scholars.

For Viktor Frankl, who saved lives in and out of concentration camps for more than 70 years.

And for my mother, class of Oberlin '78, who raised her children on the principles that have been taught at Oberlin for the last 175 years.


Along the way in my Todays in History, I have encountered Oberlin College more than a few times.

This is not because of the number of learned people I have studied, the number of artists of all sorts (writers, musicians, painters etc.) I have covered but because of the number of black people and civil rights stories and issues I have read about.

Here is one reason why:

For Oberlin, the first shard of evidence of the town's involvement in the Underground Railroad comes a private letter about an 1837 event. At that time, there were few, if any, black families in Oberlin, and only a handful of students of color in the college and its preparatory department. But one Saturday, a former Oberlin student brought a wagon load of escapees through Oberlin; they took supper in the college dining hall, where students crowded around them. On the Sabbath, they rested in Evangelically correction Oberlin, and on the following Monday were sent on their way with a guard of students assuring their safe passage.


I could fill this diary with individual instances in which the people of Oberlin the town or Oberlin the college displayed their love of freedom and humanity over what the rest of the country was (and still, in more'n a few places, is) still displaying.

Instead, having given considerable attention (and all duly so) to the black community of recent, and after a few more nods to Oberlin before Brown v. Board, there are some other things you should know.



I'm an atheist, but I think I'd find kindred spirits of humanity here.

I'd have lunch with this preacher any day of the week. Encouraging a rape victim to confront her rapist in court, even though everyone knows the man will be acquitted, gives a body and mind a chance to heal that would likely not otherwise have presented itself.

I can think of no better segue into the meat of my diary than this page of students who took Oberlin's supportive personal and academic environment and built themselves up as Allan Spear did:

In 1974, Spear became the first openly gay male legislator in the nation. He served for many years in the Minnesota Senate, ultimately as President, and was the chief Senate author of Minnesota’s 1993 GLBT rights bill, extending protection from discrimination in employment, education, and housing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Minnesotans.




When I saw that Oberlin had been founded on Sept. 2, 1833, I knew I had to write about it. That's A) because of where I've run into it before and B) because my mother went there.

So you know I have stories from her:

I went to a gay dance there once -- the first memorial Anita Bryant Gay Dance. Had fun. Nobody pressured me to do anything, which I liked. [My mother was raised in a military family, and socialization was often ... encouraged regardless of if one was going to have any fun doing it.]

Lots of flamingly gay men there -- especially organ majors, who seem to be gay almost everywhere. One of the other classics majors (which counts Greek, Latin, and classical civ. as classics) wore a button that said "How DARE you assume I'm heterosexual?"

It's still known as being academically very selective, but I don't think it's as selective as it used to was. It's huge on minorities, unless of course you're a Christian or pro-life or something; then you're kind of suspect. Same for Republicans. Straight people are okay.

There's a rock in Tappan Square (center of town, edge of campus) that people paint when they feel strongly about something. But that's probably pretty standard. Lots of places have that kind of thing. The college came before the town; the town exists because of the college. Still, there's the usual town-gown tension. But it's not as bad as it could be, because students aren't allowed to have cars on campus without a really great reason, like "I have to go to a psychiatrist in Cleveland every week."

And the town is probably still dry -- you can check that out. So there's a restaurant about .25" north of town that serves liquor, where of course my dad always had to take us. Anyway, you need to be friends with somebody over 21 and with a car to get liquor. Booze wasn't hot when I was there. Pot was. I remember I put some soil in a potted plant I had (a hoya plant) and after a few weeks, pot grew!

[My mother took the plant home, with the help of her boyfriend and his very, very conservative parents, who didn't know it was pot.] My mother used to not water it and hope it would die. And then she'd take pity on the poor wilting plant and water it, and it would perk right up again. You understand, I never smoked pot, but it was everywhere at Oberlin.

And I really never did smoke it, honey, but I'm one of about 10 people in my generation who didn't. Considering the drugs I'd been on for asthma, with their scary side effects, I wouldn't do drugs. It wasn't worth it for me. I wonder if they're big on drinking now, as every other college seems to be

My friend Alvin was the one who was taking tennis but had bad hand-ball coordination. He was gay. He'd tell people three things within 20 minutes of meeting them: he was gay, high church Episcopalian, and a fiscal conservative.


This gay-friendly culture was in place in the 1970s.

For part of the 1970s, the APA still designated homosexuality as a mental illness.

Oberlin didn't.



We do not need gay havens as we did back then, fortunately. Where I went to college, in a fairly conservative part of Virginia, there was a fairly active (though by no means huge) pride alliance. There was also a collection of right-wing nutjobs at the school paper. When one of them wrote an article many people thought was advocating that readers go out and kill the campus' gay population, there were protests.

But the work on gay safety is still not done. As I have written about before, and as many of you have probably seen for yourselves, too many people and places are not as progressive as Oberlin was 30 years ago.

But there are places we can go and learn how to fight for ourselves (as people, not as black, white, Latino, gay, disabled, whatever) and command the respect we are and should be due.

And Oberlin has been such a place for 170 years.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 9/01/2008 07:40:00 PM
No great comedian I know of, no writer of biting satire, and no famed court jester was born today.

No, today's celebrated event is above the truthiness of comedy, beyond the point at which satire is credible and far more serious (trust me) than a jester.

What happened today shaped our country's then-future in ways so ingrained in our society that it is one of those many things where we don't wonder what life would be like without it.

On Sept. 1, 1752, the Liberty Bell arrived in Philadelphia. But that isn't the funny part.


For the Allied and innocent lives lost in World War II, which began 69 years ago today.

The Liberty Bell (which wasn't then known as the Liberty Bell) came to us from England, where it was cast. The bulk of the metal (largely copper and tin) was obtained and worked in Cornwall and South Wales, the former of which was once fairly well-off but is now one of the poorest areas in England.

The bell cracked the first time it was rung in the colonies.

So it was recast. Twice.

And still it wouldn't settle down.

But that's not exactly why it looks as it does today.

Yes, it's cracked. But what you see when you look at the Liberty Bell is a machined crack:

Bell Ringer Henry Stone machined the crack into a half-inch slot 24 inches long and inserted two, copper rivets to prevent the two edges of the crack from rubbing together. The filings were collected and cast into a small bell.


Oh, and one last bit of fun for this portion of this diary:

The [b]ell was sent from England on the ship Hibernia, captained by William Child.


Hibernia is the Latin name for Ireland. And once upon a time in this country, some of us weren't so fond of the Irish.

(Those of you wisely thinking about other occupants of ships back in the day will be happy to know there were no slaves on the ship.)



The Liberty Bell is from England. The Statue of Liberty is part French. The architecture of the White House and various other massively famous buildings in this country is Greek and Roman. The numbers on those massively famous buildings are from Arabic. And if the most famous portrait of our first war hero, Gen. Washington, had the man smiling, we'd see teeth from nature, all right, but animals and trees, not the pearly whites Washington possessed in his teen years.

So the next time someone goes on about the might of America, and how America can do it all alone, remember that one of the greatest signs of strength is the ability to take a good idea and use it.

Not like it hasn't worked before.

Liberty Bell Presentation

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/31/2008 08:00:00 AM
Because of this program, whose federal status ended 69 years ago today, we have one of the most beautiful pieces of Americana I have ever encountered. I referenced it here, and I'll go into more detail here.

Because of this program, an almost-lost generation of Americans, and a generation several other generations of Americans would just as soon have left to die anonymously, gained a voice.

Perhaps because many of us are fascinated by all things old, I am fascinated by this subject.

Perhaps it is because my paternal grandfather, despite his many faults (which I have documented here more than once), sewed himself to history -- because it allowed him to hold on to fleeting memories of his father.

Or perhaps it is because so many people got such a raw deal, and here I can let them live again.



For the Confederation of the Haudenosaunee, which began possibly August 31, 1142.

This story begins on April 9, 1865, when Gen. Lee surrendered at Appomattox Courthouse.

It begins in July 1935, when the WPA was first funded.

It begins in summer 2006, when I found the Slave Narratives through Project Gutenberg.

It begins with the acceptance of slavery as a social practice.



It doesn't end. How could it end? How do you stop talking about injustice? It was defended for two hundred years, then swept away by a war, then maintained socially through the extended poverty of generations of black people.



To a student of English, the beauty here, the phonetic spellings here are beyond description:

I 'membahs de time when mah mammy wah alive, I wah a small chile, afoah dey tuck huh t' Rims Crick. All us chillens wah playin' in de ya'd one night. Jes' arunnin' an' aplayin' lak chillun will. All a sudden mammy cum to de do' all a'sited. "Cum in heah dis minnit," she say. "Jes look up at what is ahappenin'," and bless yo' life, honey, da sta's wah fallin' jes' lak rain.* Mammy wah tebble skeered, but we chillen wa'nt afeard, no, we wa'nt afeard. But mammy she say evah time a sta' fall, somebuddy gonna die. Look lak lotta folks gonna die f'om de looks ob dem sta's. Ebbathin' wah jes' as bright as day. Yo' cudda pick a pin up. Yo' know de sta's don' shine as bright as dey did back den. I wondah wy dey don'. Dey jes' don' shine as bright. Wa'nt long afoah dey took mah mammy away, and I wah lef' alone.

*(One of the most spectacular meteoric showers on record, visible all over North America, occurred in 1833.)


Or, in Upper Midlands:

I remember the time when my mommy was alive. I was a small child, before they took her to Rims Creek [Valley, North Carolina?]. All of us children were playing in the yard one night. Just running and playing like children will. All of a sudden, mommy came to the door all excited. "Come in hear this minute," she said. "Just look up at what is happening," and bless your life, honey, the stars were falling just like rain. Mommy was terribly scared, but we children weren't afraid, no, we weren't afraid. But mommy, she said every time a star falls, somebody's going to die. Looked like a lot of folks were going to die from the looks of those stars. Everything was just as bright as day. You could have picked a pin up. You know the stars don't shine as brightly as they did back then. I wonder why they don't. They just don't shine as brightly. Wasn't long before they took my mommy away, and I was left alone.






Above, I said this story begins in summer 2006. That's when (as far as I can tell from e-mail) I started volunteering for Project Gutenberg, about which the more said the better (but not here). I was working as a proofreader at the lowest level, making sure things were formatted properly, removing scanner-based typos and the like.

I was not -- and this was emphasized from the beginning -- to remove anything authentic to the original. Spelling was not to be changed from the original copy (which was provided). The transition from pictures of text to text itself was to be faithful to the original at the expense of sometimes looking weird to the untrained eye.

Among the documents I looked at were something in Norse or Finnish (I quickly begged off), documents from the Warren Commission (absolutely fascinating, though nothing particularly new), a few pages of Middle French and some 17th century poetry.

And then I stumbled upon a page of a slave narrative.

And oh, Lordy, was I hooked. This text was captivating. Here I was reading the words of an ex-slave talking about life as I could never have imagined it. And these words were not cleaned up. There were reproduced faithfully as they had been uttered.

My mind's eye and ear went nuts. As I read the text, I invented a wandering oral history gatherer (named ... eampunha;)) and imagined that gatherer coming upon these folks with such stories to tell. I gave them fairly realistic voices and filled in the details of their dwellings and clothing as they came up in the narratives.

As my imagination went, imaginary ethical concerns came up. Does one maintain objectivity while recording these stories? Surely, the job of a storyteller is to entice the listener to want to hear more, to react, to ask questions.

My imaginary recorder asked questions, was astonished, complimented corn pone (or corn bread, as it sometimes was) etc. People who tell stories want to interact with their audience, fundamentally. They want to share. And if my imaginary person was to do his job, he was going to get people talking.

Part of me will never be happy with the element of the human condition that forbids us from actually traveling to the past to meet people. Forget the linguistic element of it; meeting people who experienced things we cannot now encounter excites the child in me to levels that escape the adult facade I maintain often quite poorly. Yeah, history regards the ex-slaves as nobodies, but a nobody who tells a story that survives becomes a somebody. (So too with the people in those stories, thus part of the massive patronage of poets until fairly recently.)



To tell you everything that struck me about the hundreds of narratives I read (as a proofreader, but before long as an awe-struck 20something) would take far too long. So I will keep my comments short and instead direct you to people whose stories were preserved by the WPA.

1) Some of the slaves didn't think too highly of Abraham Lincoln. One account I read (and which I have been unable thus far to locate, out of the 2300 narratives) indicated that the ex-slave missed slavery -- not because he loved working for free but because his master was particularly kind and he (the slave) missed being cared for. Several ex-slaves noted that their lives were worse for the Civil War -- because they no longer had the guarantee of being taken care of in their old age. (This strikes me as not a validation of slavery but a consequent of this country's method of dealing with ex-slaves: Let them get their own lives in order.)

2) These narratives are case in point for anyone arguing that education isn't important. What happens when you take people with little or no formal education and set them off to fend for themselves?

Nothing.

You get a bunch of people who become sharecroppers and raise their children on hope, fresh vegetables, the Bible and valuing their cultural history.

And with that as part of an upbringing, there's nothing wrong with it. But how do you move up from that place in life?

You move up with education. And in 1880s America, the average black child is going nowhere quick in a public school. In 1930s America, the average black child is going nowhere quick in a public school.

3) Such gorgeous language. Some of you might not take to phonetic English, or you may think ebonics/AAVE (African American Vernacular English) is a linguistic farce, but anyone with an open mind ... it's breathtaking stuff. It's as close to an actual physical, audible voice as these ex-slaves were ever going to get for a mass audience:

When de day begin to crack de whole plantation break out wid all kinds of noises, and you could tell what going on by de kind of noise you hear.

Come de daybreak you hear de guinea fowls start potracking down at the edge of de woods lot, and den de roosters all start up 'round de barn and de ducks finally wake up and jine in. You can smell de sow belly frying down at the cabins in de "row," to go wid de hoecake and de buttermilk.

Den purty soon de wind rise a little, and you can hear a old bell donging way on some plantation a mile or two off, and den more bells at other places and maybe a horn, and purty soon younder go old Master's old ram horn wid a long toot and den some short toots, and here come de overseer down de row of cabins, hollering right and left, and picking de ham out'n his teeth wid a long shiny goose quill pick.

Bells and horns! Bells for dis and horns for dat! All we knowed was go and come by de bells and horns!




The youngest of the ex-slaves in this country, let alone those interviewed by the Federal Writers' program, were born in the 1860s and likely had scant, if any, memories of being regarded by the law as property. (For how much longer they were socially regarded as property ...)

Birth in the 1860s means the last of them likely died in the 1970s at the very latest. Maybe one or two made it to 1980, but I sincerely doubt that, based on health care accessibility.

But there's a bigger point here.

An ex-slave woman who had a kid in her 40s (fairly late in life) would have given birth in the 1900s. At 45 years old, which is relatively rare today but which was not unheard of in slave times (though some other elements of slaves' sex lives were aggrandized), this gives a year of birth of, say, 1905.

This means today's youngest children of slaves are in their 100s. Today's youngest grandchildren of slaves are in their 60s, possibly, and have no firsthand memories of their enslaved ancestors.

Put differently, our physical, human connections with ex-slaves are dying or dead. The people who can tell stories about their parents and grandparents the ex-slaves are dying or dead.

We missed a huge opportunity to (forgive the verb) capture the life stories of the older slaves, the ones born in the time of Washington, Jefferson and Adams, when their stories were not recorded and made public. (Tell me you wouldn't gobble up the words of a person who was living in Virginia when Gen. Washington became Pres. Washington.) Because this country is so young, people living in 1865 remembered life in 1770.

And we missed that chance. We only barely got anything done in the 1930s with the ex-slaves still living.

So let's take what we have and be grateful for it. (Pages 195-196 detail the ex-slave's work for Jesse James.)





Labels: , ,

 
by iampunha | 8/30/2008 08:00:00 AM
They got Nat at 31.

They suppressed millions for decades.

They still have to contend with Dr. C.T. Vivian.

They had to serve with 'em.

Rubin Stacy didn't stand a chance.

Ted Radcliffe was born too late.

Myles Horton made his life about them.

Today's honoree ... well, was born today. And there's a little more to it than that.



For Ted Williams, born on Aug. 30, 1918, the greatest hitter who ever lived.

Through integration, just after Brown v. Board, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, before and after the 1968 Summer Olympics protests, up to and including the black power fists raised in silence by Tommie Smith and John Carlos, this man led the NAACP.

Before and after the murders of Medgar Evers, Malcolm X, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others whose names I wish weren't associated with dying for civil rights, this man led the NAACP.

One hundred seven years ago today was born a boy of no consequence then. His story, while unique, is ... not. For many children then had parents who had to work hard and hope for more hard work to do:

The grandson of former slaves from Holly Springs, Miss., [Roy] Wilkins was born in St. Louis, where his father worked himself to sullen exhaustion in a brick kiln across the river. The boy's mother died of tuberculosis (as would his sister and brother) when he was 5, but the children were blessed with a secure and happy upbringing in the St. Paul, Minn., home of their childless Uncle Sam and Aunt Elizabeth. Sam Williams, a railroad steward, taught Wilkins two unforgettable lessons: always to keep his fingernails clipped and clean and to do his best at school, because ''no one can ever steal an education away from a man.''


Father beaten by life, mother dead.

He pressed on:

According to Wilkins, his was, for the most part, a pleasant childhood in a loving family, though not without its trials. His uncle, Sam Williams, worked for the Northern Pacific Railroad, managing the personal railroad car for the company president. The family was far from wealthy, but did not lack any of the basic necessities. Wilkins stayed close to his own “quiet neighborhood” and away from “the turf belonging to the Rice Street Gang, the toughest kids in the city,” where “the word ‘nigger’ was part of the equipment, along with other brickbats.” Despite these constraints, Wilkins would later say that it was in St. Paul that he first learned it was not impossible “for white people and black people to live next door to one another, to get along—even to love one another.”


Not impossible ... only if the majority is not told to feel threatened by the minority. (Fear-mongering in politics is as old as politics.)

Wilkins went on to significant achievement at the University of Minnesota -- in the 1920s. He edited the school paper -- in the 1920s.

Not only had no black person edited the school paper before that, no black person had done much of anything with the school paper.

About a decade later, Roy Wilkins took over the NAACP's monthly magazine.

He succeeded W.E.B. Du Bois.



Tell me you wouldn't be satisfied with your life if you were taking over for someone like W.E.B. Du Bois.

Tell me, even as a joke, that you wouldn't consider your entire life's struggle validated.



Roy Wilkins didn't say the words.

He lived them.

In 1955, Wilkins became the executive secretary of the NAACP, a position whose name changed in 1965 but whose occupant remained the same until 1977.

In between, he organized a march and did some other things. He talked to some presidents about some things and got some awards.

It takes a lot to make the Presidential Medal of Freedom pedestrian, but Roy Wilkins kept on working.

Why?

Well, when there's work to be done, do you stop working or do you keep up your momentum and get more done?

Nobody's ever going to hand you a damn thing if they want to keep it to themselves. Roy Wilkins knew that. He knew that from watching his father drag his beaten body home from work. He knew that from visiting the South:

As an editor at the Call, Wilkins waged a campaign to defeat racist Senator Henry J. Allen. This effort caught the attention of Walter White (see), executive secretary of the N.A.A.C.P., who urged Wilkins to move to New York and become his chief assistant in 1931. As White had done, Wilkins went on assignment to investigate lynchings and working conditions for African-Americans in the South. His 1932 report, "Mississippi Slave Labor," is credited with bringing Congressional action to improve the working conditions for blacks in levee labor camps.


Congressional action started because There weren't any Southern senators in the Senate chamber to introduce the matter, but not so much with the anti-lynching action. (The more I read about race relations in the time before the 1960s, and the more I refuse to adopt a historically accurate white-person lens, the more I identify with the people who didn't think nonviolent action would work.)



At 30 years old, Wilkins was doing this. Four years his junior at present, I am nowhere near any of what he did.

This would be deflating if not for how things are better now, if not for the fact that we do not now need a Roy Wilkins as much as we did back then. Yes, you're damn right there are still wrongs to be righted, but we do not now have people fleecing laborers as stridently and rampantly as we did back then. (And if we do, tell me. Never treat my words as authoritative, only investigative.)

But though the situation is not as dire, though we no longer have a president unwilling or unable to face down his party's enfranchised racists, there is still work to do. I have even showcased some of it in previous diaries (google environmental racism).

And if we choose to honor Roy Wilkins' legacy, now a few days removed from the official nomination of Barack Obama to this country's highest office, and arguably this world's most prestigious role, we can look to Wilkins' determination and vision, combine it with John F. Kennedy's call to service and add Barack Obama's oft-quoted advice:

Yes, we can.

Martin Luther King & Roy Wilkins On 1963 Meet The Press


*The University of Minnesota could have exercised more pride in the achievements of Roy Wilkins, but I am willing to let that slide partly because the school gave an opportunity to a black quarterback in the 1970s. That player was Tony Dungy. Yes, that Tony Dungy.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/27/2008 05:17:00 PM
Del Martin, a lesbian rights pioneer who took part in one of California's first same-sex weddings, died today in San Francisco after a long period of declining health. She was 87.


-San Francisco Chronicle

Because I am at work, and because this is very quickly becoming very hard for me to do and maintain a dry face, I will stop here except to say that Del and Phyllis have meant so very much to me and so very many of my friends for many years.

Del will be missed. ... no, strike that. We will miss Del.

An active voice deserves the active voice.



Photobucket
source

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/22/2008 08:00:00 AM
death is what awaited
him
and he knew it

but death
was preferable
to not living
only

brea
thing

for someone else's bottom line
and someone else's family

but
today
no more
for Nat Turner

177 years ago
a few hours ago
Nat Turner's soul said
"My body is bought, but my soul is no man's"
and struck out



For every slave, American or otherwise, who died captive, and for everyone who died while someone was trying to make 'em one.

For Annie Proulx, and if you don't know why, look her up now.

For Yosef 52, who unwittingly helped inspire the form of this diary.

And for my father, who has been writing like this for years.


Nat Turner read and wrote
and talked to God
just one of those things

God talked back
said, "let our people go."

gave him signs and support

and when the blue sun came
the black slaves rose up
and a week later
before morning had risen

they set out
to fight for their freedom
and fight to their deaths

two days later

55 whites dead
at the hands
not guns
of black slaves

3 artillery units
brought in against
70 slaves

with no guns
fighting for God
and their freedom
because if you're not
living
free
you're not
living
only

brea
thing



in southern virginia
after that
if you were black
you
were
fucked

"Yes, mmm, a certain number of innocent blacks shot down, but ... far less than might have been expected. Mmm? Oh, rather. Now, shall we see about tea?"

(get that book in your hands
turn to page 301
and cry)

after that
no more mr. nice white man
turning his head while black preachers talk about
pride
equality
freedom

don't they know this is the south?



Nat Turner's parents
and grandma
said he was a prophet

to white folks
he was beyond an
uppity
negro

killed white people who
didn't ever do him
no harm
(as we all look at each other to ask
'do you buy that?'
without speaking)

they caught him two months later

judge must have thought Nat had a hearing problem

nope
not a hearing problem
just a freedom problem
in that

he
wanted
it

and

hadn't
had
it

and

should
have
had
it

and then he did.

but by then
it was tooooo
late

on account of his now-dead body was getting
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/natturner/nat.html
skinned
and

qu

ar

te

re

d

the d was his head
which they took away for "research"
(and one man tried to display recently)

guess desecration of a corpse
applies only to the living
or maybe just white people



Nat Turner talked to God
he said so

and

Who
the
FUCK
am
I
to
say
he
didn't?

WHO?



Nat Turner talked to God
so did Harriet Tubman

white folk
who used the bible to justify
every
shitty
thing
they
did

had to bury this

so Nat Turner became a rebel
an inhuman, cold-blooded killer
a bad word

certainly not a role model
like washington and jefferson
who after all
had a permission slip
so it was
diff
rent

funny what a man becomes
when he strikes out
against his oppressor
and doesn't have that permission slip



in a way
as a slave
you're dead from the time you're born
and if you try to
change
that
they hurt you to make you decide
if the pain is worth it
and if you escape
once you kill
you've burned your only bridge
so by any means necessary

i don't blame him one bit



Nat Turner talked to God
and then met him

(our president talks to god
and lies to the rest of us)



someday
my father promises me
(without saying 'promise' but meaning it all the same)
he and i
will meet Nat Turner

i'd like to meet that man

he lived
what i am only
fucking
typing



"Go Down Moses" by Paul Robeson


Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/21/2008 08:00:00 AM
2+2? Not a problem.

452+452? Harder, but I can sum it myself.

But 4.53+65.45+649.32+.97?

I need a hard drink after I handle that one. And my customers over at the General Store have run out of casual topics to discuss while I sum their total.

Well, no more! Today I'm using the just-patented William S. Burroughs' Burroughs Registering Accountant, and I'm registering more account sales than my competitor.



For Nat Turner, who on Aug. 21, 1831, had dinner in the woods with fellow patriots, the prelude to his slave revolt, for which he was executed months later.

And for Isadore "Friz" Freleng, born on Aug. 21, 1906, who teamed with Mel Blanc for decades of American cartoon brilliance and entertainment.


So there, I was, standing in the Ottumwa, Iowa, general store, killing time while I counted up an order for a regular customer, Mort Snerd. "Why, I sure do enjoy seeing your wife's lovely cotton dresses on Sundays, Mr. Snerd," I have been known to say from time to time.

Mr. Snerd is known to reply, with a wink, "Yes, they do look lovely inside and out."

This always causes us to blush a little, but it is accepted that Mrs. Snerd is the loveliest lady in all of Ottumwa.

And the loveliest invention in all of these United States is Mr. William S. Burroughs' Registering Accountant. It was patented just today, and already sales are soaring!

That would be quite the onerous ordeal for Mr. Burroughs except that he can use his very machine to record and tally sales on the machine, including net sales, gross sales and anticipated stock!

And if you had a Burroughs Registering Accountant, you too would be able to sum figures faster than a man using paper and a knife-sharpened Dixon pencil.

Now, other men have made adding machines before Mr. Burroughs came out with his. There was a Frenchman Pascal many years ago who sought to help his businessman father get his numbers added quicker.

But Pascal's machine was slow.

It was heavy.

It didn't have the display features of Mr. Burroughs' marvelous device.

And it was too expensive for the average General Store owner.



Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, I predict that this machine will become so popular in the next five years that the days of a General Store owner having to sum figures by hand will be a thing of the past before President Cleveland leaves office!

No longer will you have to list prices in increments of 25 cents, 50 cents, even one dollar! With this handy, dandy registering accountant, you'll be able to undercut your competition!



Worried about the price, fellow General Store owner? True, even a laborer in high-falutin' Connecticut earns only $16 a week, or a little more than $800 a year, which is a little less than twice of what you'll spend on this magical machine. But think of the time you'll save counting up a customer's total and the money you'll save if you have a counting error. No longer will you have to employ your hated neighbor's son to do the math and crack jokes all day while your lady customers blush and speak in demure tones about "that young fellow" and his language. With the money you'll save using this device, you'll be able to afford expanding the store, taking on more stock, even taking the little woman out on the town once in a while. And you'll know exactly how much you spent on that soiree with the Burroughs Registering Accountant!



One day, I predict the name of Burroughs will be known in every household! So step right up, ladies and gentlemen, and be among the first to see for yourself what a marvel this machine is! What a colossus of counting clarity! Free up your future finances with this fortuitous find! The Burroughs Registering Accountant is on sale today!

Step right up, step right up, step right up!

Photobucket
Credit.

Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/20/2008 08:00:00 AM
Generations of high school students have had to suffer because of this man. "Oh, sure," they'll tell you, "he accomplished a lot in his lifetime. The world changed because of him. But for the better?"

As they toil day after day in school, and night after night at home, all because of how Adolf changed our world, there is no respect for the mountain of scholarship he gave us.

There is no acknowledgment of what the civilized world would be without Adolf.

... wait, what?

Oh. Silly me.

On Aug. 20, 1917, Nobel Prize-winning chemist Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Adolf von Baeyer died.



For Jonathan Myrick Daniels, who stood up for what was right and was murdered for it.

If you've ever tested an unknown substance to see if it was an acid or a base, you've used phenolphthalein, arguably the most annoying characteristic of which is that you have to spell it correctly at least once before you get to write "phph." (On the other hand, if your chemistry teacher is so stupid as to impose a page minimum on your lab reports, you just refer back to phenolphthalein a bunch of times. That's like half a line in a lab book.)

And in using phph (yeah, like I'm typing it again), you've encountered one of von Baeyer's most famous inventions:

Phenolphthalein is synthesized by condensation of phthalic anhydride with two equivalents of phenol under acidic conditions (hence the name). It was discovered in 1871 by Adolf von Baeyer.


Truly, a useful substance.

But today's honoree has two greater claims to fame, each more hilarious than the last.

The first ... OK. Keeping a straight face here.

I don't know who invented the concept that "You're such a snot, you think your shit smells like roses," but von Baeyer ...

Indol consists of shiny white laminae, which, however, soon assume a dark color under the influence of light and air. They melt at 52°, b. p. 253 to 254° (corr.). It is readily soluble in hot water and is volatile with water vapor. The common commercial article has an exceedingly disagreable, fecal odor. It is only when carefully purified that a product is obtained the odor of which is not decidedly disagreable and which when properly diluted reveals a floral odor.


He made it:

Indole was first obtained by Baeyer by distilling with zinc dust, either oxindole, C4H4CH2NHCO, or the product obtained by reducing indigo with tin and hydrochloric acid.


But it gets better yet. See, indole smells like shit unless you manage it right:

At high dilution indole has a pleasant odor and is used in perfumery. Indole sticks around for ages and can be thought of as a fixative or base note in perfume. Apparently, it actually turns up in jasmine and orange blossom, of all things. I take this on faith, because the only times I’ve smelled indole in my lab, it’s been not-so-dilute, and I was wishing for that mediciney urinal cake smell to cover things up.


I say this to inform, not to encourage all of you to go watering down your shit and waiting for it to smell like flowers. See, you might (if you were truly foul, or a scientist) go using your other natural waste product, which would make you only a von Baeyer copycat:

A German chemist, Adolph von Baeyer, founder of what was to become the Bayer Chemical Co., who in 1905 won the Nobel Prize in chemistry, happened in for some celebrating of his own. It was on that day that he had synthesized "malonylurea" from a reaction of urea with malonic acid, a chemical found in apples. No one knows exactly what he was trying to accomplish, but malonylurea became known as "Barbituric acid", making St. Barbara Day even more important!


What he was trying to accomplish, I'd bet, was "Hey, I wonder what happens when ..."

And what happened when?

In 1903, Fischer and von Mering were the first to synthesize a therapeutically active "barbiturate" by substituting two ethyl groups for two hydrogens attached to carbon. When they administered this new barbiturate to human subjects, the compound was found to induce sleep. The term for a drug that causes sleep induction is known as a somnolent or a hypnotic.


Later on (as the article explains), we got Valium and Halcion. We also got these puppies.

So Adolf von Baeyer gave us headaches in chemistry class, the perfume of the girl we (or at least I) fantasized about in class and the drugs her parents were doing back in the day.

(He also gave us a lot of other things. I just think the trio of phenolphthalein, indol and barbituric acid is too funny to pass up.)

Case Study: Barbiturates (1969 drug-scare film)


Labels:

 
by iampunha | 8/10/2008 08:00:00 AM
Visit Washington, D.C., today and you can rally for your government or rail against it. You can go most anywhere with just a Metro card and two working legs. You can see examples of fantastic wealth and shameful (to this society) poverty.

Children sell newspapers at Metro station exits, and street vendors are never far behind. And most anywhere you walk, you know the spirit of the Founding Fathers is there many times over (especially if you're walking near a building that was a bar in the 18th century).

And who could omit the fantastic education scene? The culture available in D.C. is insane. You could spend years in D.C. and not run out of pieces of history to absorb. On a field trip in eighth grade, I got to show my classmates a painting by a (long-dead) relative.

That painting was in the National Gallery of Art, but there are many more paintings, and many more things, period, in the Smithsonian's 18 D.C. buildings.

We owe them to James Smithson, whose name should be in every American history textbook, and whose namesake institution was created by law on Aug. 10, 1846.



For Adam Walsh, whose severed head was discovered on Aug. 10, 1981.

And for all missing and/or exploited children and the families who will never even have a body to bury, far too young.


Adam Walsh was ripped from his parents' lives more than 27 years ago. To date, the location of the rest of his body is unknown perhaps to all (if those involved in his abduction and murder are dead).

James Smithson, by contrast, was never recognized by his father. He was born of a mistress.

Many historians speculate that part of the driving force behind Leonardo da Vinci's public displays of brilliance was his desire to be validated publicly. (Those historians also point out that as an illegitimate child, he'd have had to make a living on his own anyway.)

What I've read of James Smithson, a fellow illegitimate child, suggests that Smithson might well have had the same idea in mind when he arranged for a bequeathment to the U.S. should his nephew die without any heirs.

Today, nobody knows the name Hugh Smithson (or Hugh Percy, as was later the case), and to be fair, not much of anyone has heard of James Smithson.

But tell me you haven't heard of the Smithsonian.

There is much to laud Smithson for in the business world. He, like Nobel, Carnegie and Bell, was an excellent scientist and investor.

But lots of people are really smart and capitalized on their smarts for the future benefit of humanity.

Not many people translated that into 18 museums in Washington, D.C., and a legacy of scholarship that would frankly require a cataclysm to physically delete from the D.C. landscape and scholarship scene.



Even better than the magnificent gift James Smithson gave us is how the U.S. used it. Yes, museums. Yes, a fantastic amount of history, natural and otherwise.

Yes, scenes and sounds to saturate a body, mind and soul with wisdom of the past to secure the wisdom of the future.

But that's not the most important element of it to me.

I grew up half an hour from D.C., half an hour from this massive collection of the Earth's finest. It was so much a part of my life that, in my naive youth, I actually eventually tired of some parts of it (the art). The science, though, I could never get tired of. I understand science to a great degree than I understand art (which is one reason I lump artists together and explain science).

I could tire of any of it, and anyone else could tire of it, because the only requirement for admission to the Smithsonian is that you enter the building when it is open. And really, as long as you don't give the staff a reason to make you leave, you can visit open to close every day but Christmas. You could get a pretty formidable education that way. You could also beat the D.C. heat for free.

This seemed like the natural state of things to me until 1995, when a trip to France, complete with castles you have to pay (something like $7 a pop) to tour, showed me just how much better it is when information is available to everyone.



As with Johns Hopkins, few people today know much about James Smithson. Many know nothing, not even that he is the namesake for such an incredible scholastic institution.

But we know so much because of his gift to this country, and because Congress and the president saw fit to grace this country with the Smithsonian Institute in response to this portion of Smithson's will (bolding mine):

In the case of the death of my said Nephew without leaving a child or children, or the death of the child or children he may have had under the age of twenty-one years or intestate, I then bequeath the whole of my property subject to the Annuity of One Hundred pounds to John Fitall, & for the security & payment of which I mean Stock to remain in this Country, to the United States of America, to found at Washington, under the name of the Smithsonian Institution, an Establishment for the increase & diffusion of knowledge among men.


Labels: