by Winter Rabbit | 11/24/2009 09:27:00 PM

Chief Black Kettle:


I want you to give all these chiefs of the soldiers here to understand that we are for peace, and that we have made peace, that we may not be mistaken by them for enemies.






A Cheyenne cemetery is in the same direction as where my mother told me she watched gypsies camp through her west window as a girl, about ½ mile from that house. I have reverently walked though that Cheyenne cemetery as early as ten, looking at the headstones and wondering who they were and where they came from. I did not know then, that in that cemetery were descendants from the Sand Creek Massacre.

The Approaching Genocide Towards Sand Creek


Simultaneously, Roman Nose led the Dog Soldiers in battle while Black Kettle strove for peace.






Source

"...Roman Nose made his record against the whites, in defense of territory embracing the Republican and Arickaree rivers. He was killed on the latter river in 1868, in the celebrated battle with General Forsythe.

Roman Nose always rode an uncommonly fine, spirited horse, and with his war bonnet and other paraphernalia gave a wonderful exhibition. The Indians used to say that the soldiers must gaze at him rather than aim at him, as they so seldom hit him even when running the gantlet before a firing line..."




Why did Roman Nose and the Hotamitanio (Dog Soldier Society) feel the need to defend their sovereignty and way of life? The answers to that one question rest in at least the following: the Great Horse Creek Treaty (1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie), volunteer soldiers, John Chivington, white encroachment with the Pike's Peak gold rush of 1858, the "renegotiation" of the "Great Horse Creek Treaty" at Fort Wise, the Civil War soldiers who encroached on promised land, and the murder of Lean Bear.

The first core point is that hunting rights and land claims were not surrendered in the Great Horse Creek Treaty (1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie).


1851 TREATY OF FORT LARAMIE

The following are facts with regard to the 1851 TREATY OF FORT LARAMIE, known as the "Treaty of Long Meadows" to the N/DN/D/Lakota and the "Great Horse Creek Treaty" to the Cheyenne;


1. It is a sacred document, unanimously agreed upon by each camp of each band, of each of the seven signatory nations. During the three week long 1851 Treaty gathering, the sacred White Buffalo Calf Canunpa (misnomer "Peace pipe") of the N/DN/D/Lakota, the Four Sacred Arrows of the Cheyenne, as well as the most sacred items of each of the other nations were present during the historic signing.

2. It is a unifying document among the seven allied nations to forever protect their sacred homelands.


Second of all, the Pike's Peak gold rush of 1858 brought white encroachment by ways of pony express riders, telegraph wires, stagecoaches, and more and more military forts whose soldiers (at least in the Sand Creek Massacre) included volunteer soldiers under the command of Col. John Chivington.(1)

To illustrate, here is a poster from 1864 that portrays the recruitment of volunteer soldiers, which helped to result in the California terrorist attacks. That was the same year as the Sand Creek Massacre.


GENOCIDE AGAINST NATIVE AMERICANS HISTORY: THE CALIFORNIA STORY

ATTENTION!


INDIAN

FIGHTERS

The 1849 agreement between California territorial and federal governments provided $1,000,000 for the arming and supply of persons who would seek out and destroy Native American families.


I don't know if such posters were in or near Colorado, but John Chivington who led the "Bloody Third" scorned Indian children.


http://www.geocities...

COL. JOHN CHIVINGTON: Ex-Methodist Minister, Heroic Indian Fighter, 1864


"Nits make lice,"
he was fond of saying, and of course, since Indians were lice, their children were nits. Clearly, Chivington was a man ahead of his time: it would be almost a century later before another man would think of describing the extermination of a people "the same thing as delousing": Heinrich Himmler. [LN477]


Clearly, Roman Nose had a more than sufficient reason to defend his people.

Matters continued becoming worse for the Cheyenne and Arapaho as the white encroachment increased dramatically with the Pike's Peak gold rush of 1858, despite the land being promised them in the Great Horse Creek Treaty (1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie). The Territory of Colorado was then "declared" a decade after that treaty, and politicians wanted to "renegotiate" the Great Horse Creek Treaty at Fort Wise. It was far from a compromise, it was theft.


Source

ARTICLE 1.


"The said chiefs and delegates
of said Arapaho and Cheyenne tribes of Indians do hereby cede and relinquish to the United States all lands now owned, possessed, or claimed by them, wherever situated, except a tract to be reserved for the use of said tribes located within the following described boundaries, to wit:..."


Some "negotiation..." 38 of the 44 Cheyenne chiefs did not sign it.


Dee Brown. "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee." p. 69:

"...When the Cheyennes pointed out that only six of their forty-four chiefs were present, the United States officials replied that the others could sign it later..."(1)


Adding still more misery, were facts that hunting was scarce on this land tract, nor was it suited well to farming. Also, the white encroachment from the Pike's Peak gold rush escalated, while Civil War soldiers roamed onto their grounds. Then, Chivington, the butcher of Sand Creek, began his campaign of extermination and genocide.


Source

In the spring of 1864, while the Civil War raged in the east, Chivington launched a campaign of violence against the Cheyenne and their allies, his troops attacking any and all Indians and razing their villages. The Cheyennes, joined by neighboring Arapahos, Sioux, Comanches, and Kiowas in both Colorado and Kansas, went on the defensive warpath.



Chief Black Kettle was promised complete safety by Colonel Greenwood as long as he rose the U.S flag above him.(1) Black Kettle persisted in his calls for peace in spite of the continuing exterminations and the shooting of Lean Bear.

(All bold mine)

Source

Lean Bear, a leading peacemaker who had previously met with President Abraham Lincoln in Washington, D.C., was shot from his horse without warning by U.S. troops during a Kansas buffalo hunt.
The troops were acting under orders from Colonel John M. Chivington who commanded the military district of Colorado: "Find Indians wherever you can and kill them" (The War of the Rebellion, 1880-1881, pp. 403-404).


Perplexed by the continuing genocide, Black Kettle sent for Little White Man, known asWilliam Bent.Almost prophetic, both agreed in their meeting that a war was about to be born if nothing changed. Black Kettle's peaceful attempts tragically failed, even though he took his people to Sand Creek, fully expecting peace.His last effort for peace was raising the U.S. flag just prior to the massacre.


Source

"...Though no treaties were signed, the Indians believed that by reporting and camping near army posts, they would be declaring peace and accepting sanctuary.

However on the day of the "peace talks" Chivington received a telegram from General Samuel Curtis (his superior officer) informing him that "I want no peace till the Indians suffer more...No peace must be made without my directions."


Chivington, the Butcher of the Sand Creek Massacre:


COL. JOHN CHIVINGTON: Ex-Methodist Minister

"Nits make lice,"

he was fond of saying, and of course, since Indians were lice, their children were nits. Clearly, Chivington was a man ahead of his time: it would be almost a century later before another man would think of describing the extermination of a people "the same thing as delousing": Heinrich Himmler. [LN477]


Photobucket
http://www.forttours.com/images/chivington.jpg


Source

"the Cheyennes will have to be roundly whipped -- or completely wiped out -- before they will be quiet. I say that if any of them are caught in your vicinity, the only thing to do is kill them." A month later, while addressing a gathering of church deacons, he dismissed the possibility of making a treaty with the Cheyenne: "It simply is not possible for Indians to obey or even understand any treaty. I am fully satisfied, gentlemen, that to kill them is the only way we will ever have peace and quiet in Colorado."


(It is worth noting also that the Fuhrer from time to time expressed admiration for the "efficiency" of the American genocide campaign against the Indians, viewing it as a forerunner for his own plans and programs.)


Unaware of Curtis's telegram, Black Kettle and some 550 Cheyennes and Arapahos, having made their peace, traveled south to set up camp on Sand Creek under the promised protection of Fort Lyon. Those who remained opposed to the agreement headed North to join the Sioux.



The Sand Creek Massacre of November 29, 1864


Black Kettle and his people had every reason to expect complete safety from their bloodshed after agreements for peace were made and the Dog Soldiers left to join the Sioux. Nonetheless, Chivington's troops advanced on the Cheyenne and Arapaho near dawn. The sound of those approaching hooves must have sounded ominous.

U.S. soldiers inevitably chased the defenseless Cheyenne and Arapaho by horse and foot with knives and guns in hand. Their victims had to be positioned before ripping off their scalps, cutting off their ears, smashing out their brains, butchering their children, tearing their breastfeeding infants away from their mother's breasts, and then murdering those infants. The "Bloody Third" soldiers necessarily had to kill the infants before cutting out their mother's genitals.

The one question I never saw asked in the congressional hearings was, "Didn't you disgraceful soldiers realize they were family?"


Kurt Kaltreider, PH.D. "American Indian Prophecies." pp. 58-59:


-The report of witnesses at Sand Creek:

"I saw some Indians that had been scalped, and the ears cut off the body of White Antelope," said Captain L. Wilson of the first Colorado Cavalry. "One Indian who had been scalped had also his skull smashed in, and I heard that the privates of White Antelope had been cut off to make a tobacco bag of. I heard some of the men say that the privates of one of the squaws had been cut out and put on a stick..."
John S. Smith...

All manner of depredations were inflicted on their persons; they were scalped, their brains knocked out; the men used their knives, ripped open women, clubbed little children, knocked them in the heads with their guns, beat their brains out, mutilated their bodies in every sense of the word...worse mutilation that I ever saw before, the women all cut to pieces...children two or three months old; all ages lying there.


From sucking infants up to warriors.

Sand Creek being a deliberate massacre is not contested, especially since the "Bloody Third" set the village in flames and took all the evidence back to Washington to hide it.


Source

Letters written by those at Sand Creek From Lt. Silas Soule to Maj. Edward Wynkoop, Dec. 14, 1864:


"The massacre lasted six or eight hours...I tell you Ned it was hard to see little children on their knees have their brains beat out by men professing to be civilized....They were all scalped, and as high as a half a dozen [scalps] taken from one head. They were all horribly mutilated...You could think it impossible for white men to butcher and mutilate human beings as they did there, but every word I have told you is the truth, which they do not deny...I expect we will have a hell of a time with Indians this winter."



Source

Before departing, the command, now the "Bloody Third", ransacked and burned the village.
The surviving Indians, some 300 people, fled north towards other Cheyenne camps.


Medicine Calf Beckwourth sought Black Kettle to ask him if peace was yet possible, but Black Kettle had moved out to be with relatives. Leg-in-the-Water replaced him as the primary chief; so, Beckwourth asked Leg-in-the-Water if there could be peace. Principle chief Leg-in-the-Water responded with these powerful words.



Dee Brown. "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee." p. 94:


"The white man has taken our country, killed all of our children. Now no peace. We want to go meet our families in the spirit land. We loved the whites until we found out they lied to us, and robbed us of what we had. We have raised the battle ax until death."(1)







Source

...despite broken promises and attacks on his own life, speak of him as a great leader with an almost unique vision of the possibility for coexistence between white society and the culture of the plains…




”Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” by Dee Brown. p. 92.

Chivington and his soldiers destroyed the lives or the power of every Cheyenne and Arapaho chief who had held out for peace with the white men.




Thanks to Meteor Blades from a previous post of this diary

Here are some of the names of those reputed to have been killed at Sand Creek, according to various sources:

Vo-ke-cha/White Hat
Na-ko-ne-tum/Bear Skin or Robe
Na-ko-yu-sus/Wounded Bear
O-ko-che-voh-i-tan/Crow Necklace
No-ko-a-mine/Bear Feathers
Ne-sko-mo-ne/Two Lances
O-ne-mok-tan/Black Wolf
Vo-ki-ve-cum-se-mos-ta/White Antelope
E-se-ma-ki/One Eye
Ne-so-min-ni/Tall Bear
Co-kah-you-son-ne/Feather Head
On-ne-ma(hito)/Tall or Big Wolf
O-ka-cha-his-ta/Heap of Crows -
killed were both a father and son
of the same name,
and the sons wife and children.
O-ko-che-vo-voi-se/Spotted Crow
Ma-pa-vin-iste/Standing Water
Make-ti-he/Big Head
Mah-she-ne-(ve)/Red Arm
No-ko-ist/Sitting Bear
Vou-ti-pat/Kiowa
Mak-o-wah/Big Shell
O-ne-ah-tah/Wolf Mule
Ve-hoe/White Man
Oh-to-mai-ha/Tall Bull
Mok-tow/Black Horse
Oh-co-mo-on-est/Yellow Wolf
No-veh-yah/Loser in the Race
Co-pe-pah/Coffee
Ta-ik-ha-seh/Cut Nose
Veh-yah-nak-hoh/Hog
No-ko-nis-seh/Lame Bear
Oh-tam-i-mi-neh/Dog Coming Up
Why-mih-est/Foot Tracks
One-vah-kies/Bob-Tail Wolf
Mo-ke-kah/Blue Crane
Ah-kah/Skunk
Ni-het/Mound Of Rocks
Vos-ti-o-kist/White Calf
Oh-e-vil/(Morning Star or Dull Knife,
listed as Black Kettles brother)
Min-ne-no-ah/Whirlwind or Standing Bear
Mi-hah-min-est/Spirit Walking
Wost-sa-sa-mi/White Crane
Wi-can-noh/Forked Stick
O-hit-tan/Crow
Mah-hite/(Iron ?)
Mah-ki-mish-yov/Big Child
Man-i-tan/Red Paint
To-ha-voh-yest/White Faced Bull
No-ko-ny-u-/Kills Bear
No-ko-nih-tyes/Big Louse
O-ha-ni-no/Man On Hill
Mah-voh-ca-mist/White Beaver
Mah-in-ne-est/Turtle Following His Wife
Mak-iv-veya-tah/Wooden Leg
O-ma-ish-po/Big Smoke
Ne-o-mi-ve-yuh/Sand Hill
Mo-ha-yah/Elk AKA Cohoe
Van-nit-tah/Spanish Woman
O-tat-ta-wah/Blue Horse
Kingfisher
Cut Lip Bear
Smoke or Big Smoke
One Eye
Big Man
Cheyenne Chief Left Hand.
Kah-makt/ Stick or Wood;
Oh-no-mis-ta/Wolf That Hears;
Co-se-to/Painted or Pointed Tomahawk;
Ta-na-ha-ta/One Leg;
O-tah-nis-to(te)/Bull That Hears;
O-tah-nis-ta-to-ve/Seven Bulls
Mis-ti-mah/Big Owl
No-ko-i-yan/Bear Shield
Vo-ki-mok-tan/Black Antelope
O-to-a-yest-yet/Bull Neck
Sish-e-nue-it/Snake
Non-ne/Lame Man, White Bear or Curious Horn
O-ne-na-vist/Wolf Horn
Com-sev-vah/Shriveled Leg
O-ne-i-nis-to/Wolf That Speaks or
Howling Wolf
No-ko-i-kat/Little Bear
O-ne-mi-yesp/Flying Bird
Moh-sehna-vo-voit/Spotted Horse
Ish-ho-me-ne/Rising Sun
Wip-puh-tah/Empty Belly
Mah-oist/Red Sheath
Ak-kin-noht/Squirrel
Meh-on-ne/Making Road
O-ko-oh-tu-eh/Bull Pup,
Male Crow O-ye-kis/Man Who Peeps Over The Hill
O-ne-i-kit/Little wolf
Sa-wah-nah/Shawnee
Mok-tok-kah/Wolf Road
O-ha-va-man/Scabby Man
Ta-ne-vo/Arapahoe
A-st-yet/Bushy Head
Ca-sum-mi/Wolf Grey
Kah-i-nist-teh/Standing Skunk
Kast-yah/Lean Belly
No-ko-mi-kis/Old bear
Tah-vo-tuveh/Mad Bull
Vo-tou-yah/Tall Bird
No-ko-se-vist/? Bear
Es-toh/Stuffed Gut
Oh-mah/Little Beaver
Mah-hi-vist/Red Bird
Ve-hoe/White Man
O-ko-che-ut-tan-yuh/Male Crow
E-yo-vah-hi-heh/Yellow Woman
Min-hit-it-tan-yeh/Male Cherry
A-ya-ma-na-kuh/Bear Above
O-kin-neh/Smooth Face
No-ku-hist/(Possibly White Bear)

Labels: , , , ,

 
by Winter Rabbit | 11/22/2009 06:51:00 PM


and out of that heightened violence came the massacre for which Thanksgiving is named.



Thanksgiving Day Celebrates A Massacre

William B. Newell, a Penobscot Indian and former chairman of the Anthropology department at the University of Connecticut, says that the first official Thanksgiving Day celebrated the massacre of 700 Indian men, women and children during one of their religious ceremonies. "Thanksgiving Day" was first proclaimed by the Governor of the then Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1637 to commemorate the massacre of 700 men, women and children who were celebrating their annual Green Corn Dance...Thanksgiving Day to the, "in their own house", Newell stated.

- small snip –

-----The very next day the governor declared a Thanksgiving Day.....For the next 100 years, every Thanksgiving Day ordained by a Governor was in honor of the bloody victory, thanking God that the battle had been won."



Without having the book or being able to see it online, the proclamation appears, according to Richard Drinnon, to have come from William Bradford. I'll be buying the book. "'Thanksgiving Day'" was first proclaimed by the Governor of the then Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1637," as from Newell, which was John Winthrop.

But "William Bradford became the governor of Plymouth after the first governor died in 1621."

And in "1631, John Winthrop (1588-1649) became the first elected official in America—governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony."


They were both Puritans, they both probably said it.


Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian Hating & Empire Building

The original Thanksgiving was marked by prayer and thanks for the untimely deaths of most of the Wampanoag Tribe due to smallpox contracted from earlier European visitors. Thus when the Pilgrims arrived they found the fields already cleared and planted, and they called them their own.

- snip -

He was inspired to issue a proclamation: “This day forth shall be a day of celebration and thanksgiving for subduing the Pequots.” The authentic Thanksgiving Day was born.



The following source cites Drinnon in the next paragraph, so I assume the following came from Drinnon as well.


Source

Jump 129 years to 1621, year of the supposed "first Thanksgiving." There is not much documentation of that event, but surviving Indians do not trust the myth. Natives were already dying like flies thanks to European-borne diseases. The Pequot tribe reportedly numbered 8,000 when the Pilgrims arrived, but disease had reduced their population to 1,500 by 1637, when the first, officially proclaimed, all-Pilgrim "Thanksgiving" took place. At that feast, the whites of New England celebrated their massacre of the Pequots. "This day forth shall be a day of celebration and thanksgiving for subduing the Pequots," read Massachusetts Bay Governor John Winthrop's proclamation. Few Pequots survived.


The first Official Thanksgiving was gratitude for genocide in 1637, and in 1676 – 1677 “a day was set apart for public thanksgiving,” because nearly all of them were exterminated by then.



http://www.dinsdoc.com/lauber-1-5.htm

3 See Sylvester, op. cit., ii, p. 457, for expedients adopted by Massachusetts to obtain money to defend the frontiers. Yet the number killed and sold, along with those who escaped, practically destroyed the warring Indians. According to the Massachusetts Records of 1676-1677 a day was set apart for public thanksgiving, because, among other things of moment, “there now scarce remains a name or family of them (the Indians) but are either slain, captivated or fled.”




http://rwor.org/a/firstvol/883/thank.htm

In their victory, the settlers launched an all-out genocide against the remaining Native people. The Massachusetts government offered 20 shillings bounty for every Indian scalp, and 40 shillings for every prisoner who could be sold into slavery. Soldiers were allowed to enslave any Indian woman or child under 14 they could capture. The "Praying Indians" who had converted to Christianity and fought on the side of the European troops were accused of shooting into the treetops during battles with "hostiles." They were enslaved or killed. Other "peaceful" Indians of Dartmouth and Dover were invited to negotiate or seek refuge at trading posts – and were sold onto slave ships.

- snip -

After King Philip's War, there were almost no Indians left free in the northern British colonies. A colonist wrote from Manhattan's New York colony: "There is now but few Indians upon the island and those few no ways hurtful. It is to be admired how strangely they have decreased by the hand of God, since the English first settled in these parts." In Massachusetts, the colonists declared a "day of public thanksgiving" in 1676, saying, "there now scarce remains a name or family of them [the Indians] but are either slain, captivated or fled."

Fifty-five years after the original Thanksgiving Day, the Puritans had destroyed the generous Wampanoag and all other neighboring tribes. The Wampanoag chief King Philip was beheaded. His head was stuck on a pole in Plymouth, where the skull still hung on display 24 years later.


Furthermore, the continuing historical context of the Massacre for which Thanksgiving is named was in the context of “slave-producing wars in New England.”




The war consisted of two battles: the Mistick Fight, and the Swamp Fight. In the first of these two events, but seven captives were taken.1 In the second, the Swamp Fight, about one hundred and eighty captives were taken.2 Two of the sachems taken in the Swamp Fight were spared, on promise that they guide the English to the retreat of Sassacus. The other men captives, some twenty or thirty in number, were put to death.3 The remaining captives, consisting of about eighty women and children, were divided. Some were given to the soldiers, whether gratis or for pay does not appear. Thirty were given to the Narraganset who were allies of the English, forty-eight were sent to Massachusetts and the remainder were assigned to Connecticut.4



During the years 1675 and 1676, one finds mention of the sale of Indians in Plymouth in groups of about a hundred,2 fifty-seven,3 three,4 one hundred and sixty,5 ten,6 and one.7 From June 25, 1675 to September 23, 1676, the records show the sale by the Plymouth colonial authorities of one hundred and eighty-eight Indians.8

In the Massachusetts Bay colony a similar disposal of captives was accomplished. On one occasion about two hundred were transported and sold.9 There is extant a paper written by Daniel Gookin in 1676, one item of which is as follows: “a list of the Indian children that came in with John of Packachooge.” The list shows twenty-one boys and eleven girls distributed throughout the colony.10



Hence, the continuing historical context of the Massacre for which Thanksgiving is named: "In Massachusetts, the colonists declared a 'day of public thanksgiving' in 1676, saying, "there now scarce remains a name or family of them [the Indians] but are either slain, captivated or fled."


A cold question arises about whether "the sale of Indians in Plymouth" was at least silently appreciated by the colony. Did they? Were they glad "the Indians" were almost exterminated? They never actually said they were far as I know.



Source

It all began when Philip (called Metacom by his own people), the leader of the Wampanoag Indians, led attacks against English towns in the colony of Plymouth. The war spread quickly, pitting a loose confederation of southeastern Algonquians against a coalition of English colonists. While it raged, colonial armies pursued enemy Indians through the swamps and woods of New England, and Indians attacked English farms and towns from Narragansett Bay to the Connecticut River Valley. Both sides, in fact, had pursued the war seemingly without restraint, killing women and children, torturing captives, and mutilating the dead. The fighting ended after Philip was shot, quartered, and beheaded in August 1676.


How many were glad Saddam Hussein was hung? How many would be glad if all the perpetrators of 9-11 were shot? One last question, how many realize that then and now, colonialism always brings more violence as "a colonizing European nation was asserting political jurisdiction."



Puritans, Indians, and Manifest Destiny. p.75 - 76


...But tribal rivalries and wars were relatively infrequent prior to Puritan settlement (compared to the number of wars in Europe)...Neither would have increased if it were not that a colonizing European nation was asserting political jurisdiction, in the name of God, over indigenous New England societies...When thus threatened with the usurpation of their own rights, as native tribes had been threatened years before by them, Puritans came to the defense of a system of government that was similar, in important ways, to the native governments that they had always defined as savage and uncivilized...


Some have lost careers over stating the obvious: the US brings it upon itself.


Howard Zinn. A People's History Of The United States. p. 682.

We are not hated because we practice democracy, value freedom, or uphold human rights. We are hated because our government denies these things to people in Third World countries whose resources are coveted by our multinational corporations. That hatred we have sown has come back to haunt us in the form of terrorism.


(Paraphrasing)
"And in secret places in our minds, in places we don't talk about, we can't handle the truth."



That is true now, and it was true then. Genocide and slavery "saved lives," just the lives the dominant culture wanted to live. And for that, the dominant culture (a mind set) is grateful.


http://www.republicoflakotah.com/2009/cooking-the-history-books-the-thanksgiving-massacre/

William Bradford, in his famous History of the Plymouth Plantation, celebrated the Pequot massacre:

“Those that scraped the fire were slaine with the sword; some hewed to peeces, others rune throw with their rapiers, so as they were quickly dispatchte, and very few escapted. It was conceived they thus destroyed about 400 at this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fyer, and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stincke and sente there of, but the victory seemed a sweete sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully for them, thus to inclose their enemise in their hands, and give them so speedy a victory over so proud and insulting an enimie.”


"William Bradford, the author of Of Plymouth Plantation (c. 1630, c. 1646), has been hailed as the father of American history."- He sure as hell is.



Correction:


The timeline itself along with basic knowledge of the Pilgrim's Puritan's religious beliefs exposes the fact that historically speaking, Thanksgiving was literally about gratitude for genocide.

Labels: , , , , , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/22/2009 08:00:00 AM
Not much content here, but I thought that this video of the first Thanksgiving--as told by children--was pretty good. As they say, "out of the mouths of babes."


Enjoy!








Labels: , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/20/2009 12:01:00 PM
It's Friday. Ramble on!



Whew. What a week. Follow me on below . . .



A decades-long shift in university governance away from faculty toward administrators means that faculty have a much weaker voice than ever. With budget cuts and shrinking lines, it is critically important for university faculty to organize, organize, organize.

Along those lines:

Last year, Willamette University took a step toward reducing tensions surrounding the budget. As we planned for the current year, we faced the high degree of uncertainty that the financial crisis has forced on many universities. We dealt with this situation by shifting from planning a fixed budget to planning a flexible one. The process required to design this more elaborate plan resulted in unusually deep discussion between faculty members and administrators about which high-priority items needed to be included in the “base” budget and which could be deferred pending receipt of the revenue that might be generated by higher enrollment. Contingency plans were thus devised and discussed before we incorporated them into the budget.


This is a good idea, and one that I hope spreads to other institutions. Faculty have a wealth of experience in a variety of disciplines. Use it.






On the "let's ruin education" front:

Note:

In the past decade or so, the practice of faculty governance has become increasingly vexed by the proliferation of special interest research and teaching centers sponsored by outside benefactors who expect to be involved in the content and management of programs they pay for. University administrations, strapped for resources and hungry for fame, have found it difficult to turn down any offer of support for teaching and research, even if it comes with ideological mandates.



It spans disciplines:

In the new audit, the inspector general [for the Department of Health and Human Services] reviewed data from the federal government's 2006 fiscal year and found universities almost always trust scientists to judge whether their stock holdings or payments from outside medical companies pose any conflict of interest.


At my own school we have the "BB&T Professor for the Study of Capitalism." The money for it came from a bank, and one of the conditions is that the professor assign Ayn Rand in his classes. That seems crazy to me, but I'm told that "we need the money."


Meanwhile, out in the "heartland," the University of Nebraska is setting the stage for allowing a political agenda to interfere with the educational process in their own system:

In an unusual pushback against President Obama’s expansion of federal financing of human embryonic stem cell research, the University of Nebraska is considering restricting its stem cell experiments to cell lines approved by President George W. Bush.


That sound you hear, and the smell you notice, is the slow decay of American higher education.





Each year the AHA publishes the latest misery in job numbers, and cautions (explicitly or implicitly) that there are too many PhDs out there competing for jobs. OK, OK, sometimes the news is cautiously optimistic, but the job market is very difficult.

The University of California system just approved a 32% tuition increase. I understand that California has its own unique set of problems, but these things are happening everywhere, and the tuition increases are coming on top of layoffs.

As we head into the interview season in San Diego, we should keep asking ourselves if doctoral programs are doing the right thing by continuing to crank out new PhDs each year. Numbers might have been decent last year, but the recession virtually guarantees that in the next few years the job numbers are going to be awful. Universities will be lucky if all they do is not hire for a few years. Many will be cutting faculty, not just letting lines expire.





I don't use Twitter, but I like the concept, and think it's kind of cool. In fact we're talking about setting up a system here on my campus where the various television monitors around campus [which are used for announcements of various kinds] would display a wiffiti screen that would be full of tweets. Students could then respond to an issues-oriented question by tweeting their answers in, which would then be displayed around campus. The idea is to get students civicly engaged.

Still, I'm not sure it's great for discourse--it's more like modern graffiti, I think. But just so you know, they're passing high-tech notes about you while you're talking.

But then again, some people encourage it.

Cole W. Camplese, director of education-technology services at Pennsylvania State University at University Park, prefers to teach in classrooms with two screens — one to project his slides, and another to project a Twitter stream of notes from students. He knows he is inviting distraction — after all, he’s essentially asking students to pass notes during class. But he argues that the additional layer of communication will make for richer class discussions.


I'm not sure that's such a great idea, but whatever. The person is an IT guy who doesn't regularly teach. So this seems experimental, at best.





Beer of the week? Anchor Steam. First brewed in California in the 1880s, "steam" beer (also known as "California Common") is a patented style, although the process is pretty easy.

There are two main types of yeast for brewing: lager yeast (Saccharomyces uvarum) and ale yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Lager yeast ferments at a low temperature--under 55 degrees Fahrenheit--and at the bottom of the tank. Ale yeast ferments at warmer temperatures--usually between 55 and 75--and at the top of the tank. If the beer is allowed to ferment at higher temperatures, the yeast will produce fusel alcohol in addition to the normal ethyl alcohol. Fusel alcohol is good for some things, but not to drink. It gives beer a solvent-like flavor that is awful.

Steam beer was developed in California, and uses a lager yeast but ferments the sugars at temperatures normally reserved for ale yeasts. In most cases this would give the beer a strong, hot, spicy, solvent flavor. The folks at anchor use a patented strain of yeast, and carefully control the flavor profile with specialty malts and hops.

The result is a strongly-flavored beer that has characteristics of both ale and lager. Yummy.

Why the name "steam?" Nobody's sure, even the people at Anchor.



Labels: ,

 
by Unknown | 11/19/2009 08:00:00 AM
For the second year in a row, I've been snookered into asked to help judge the Cliopatria Awards. These are the premier awards for history blogging, sponsored by Ralph Luker's excellent group blog Cliopatria.

There are six awards offered: Best Group Blog, Best Individual Blog, Best New Blog, Best Post, Best Series of Posts, and Best Writer. I'll be helping to judge two of the six categories.

Nominations are open until the end of the month. They've been a little slow so far, so please head on over and nominate your favorite blogger, blog, or post. Thanks!

Labels: ,

 
by Winter Rabbit | 11/18/2009 04:14:00 PM
The clear origins of the Native American Flute date back several thousand millennia to flutes made of bone, to petroglyphs, and oral history. Unclear "origins" involve the Spanish Conquest insofar as the Spanish stealing the bamboo flute from Asia, and then introducing it to the Five Civilized Tribes. A Cheyenne Flute Maker relayed this to me. The idea goes, that the bamboo flute was made out of river cane by the Five Civilized Tribes after the Spanish "brought" the bamboo flute to the "New World." Subsequently, river cane flutes then proceeded to be constructed out of cedar wood by the Plains Tribes; hence, its origins within this idea being called Asian – Spanish. However, the Cheyenne Flute Maker said that the tribes already possessed the flute prior to the invasion, and the Spanish may have introduced it to a few. That raises some questions, but the ultimate answer we shall see is one of mystery.



What family of trees were flutes being constructed out of then? What are some woods that they are being made out of now? After answering those questions along with some general knowledge in that area, we will proceed to the clear and unclear origins of the flute. The only clear thing is that it's a mystery who specifically invented the first flutes world wide as old as approximately 82,000 years ago.



The juniper family of trees, including cedar, was used to make the earliest flutes. To illustrate, flutes were possibly constructed out of the Arizona cypress, the Utah juniper, or the Rocky Mountain juniper, but definitely out of the eastern red cedar. The length of the branch used was crucial in determining the overall pitch desired in the flute being made. To be more specific, the distance between the holes on the flute determined the musical scale that the flute would play, which was a process of trial and error to achieve the desired order of notes. Generally speaking, longer and larger flutes were lower in pitch, while shorter and smaller flutes were higher in pitch.

Photobucket

Currently, other woods that flutes are being made out of today besides cedar are the following: maple, cherry, apple, pear, teak, walnut, purpleheart, ash, and spruce. This includes making them out of tree branches as opposed to buying a block of the relevant wood at a hardware store. There were cultural uses of the flute.

According to the guide at the Cherokee National Museum, the flute was used in courting. Furthermore, when the man was successful with the flute in his courting purposes in the matriarchal society of the Cherokee Nation, the woman whom he had successfully courted broke the flute in half. She did so to prevent him from playing it for anyone else. For the Cheyenne, it is historically for courting and personal expression. While some tribes have used the flute in ceremony, it's crucial to state that some have not - all the tribes are different.

Photobucket


What does all this have to do with the fact that soldiers who became sleepy accused the Cheyenne of performing witchcraft when they heard Cheyenne flute music in the Cheyenne camps? According to the Cheyenne Flute Maker, when the soldiers were in the camps and heard the flute music being played, the soldiers got sleepy and fell asleep. The Doctrine of Discovery states, ”to find, discover and investigate whatsoever islands, countries, regions or provinces of heathens and infidels, in whatsoever part of the world placed, which before this time were unknown to all Christians;” and, Henry VII authorized Cabot to “conquer, occupy and possess” any discovered land whatsoever. Let's think of the question again. What does this have to do with the fact that the soldiers accused the Cheyenne of performing witchcraft? It wouldn't be the first time in history that fundamentalists associated music virtuosity, originality, and excellence with evil. For example, some thought Paganini played the violin so fast and furious that he was possessed by demons, and some believed Robert Johnson sold his soul to the Devil in order to play the blues. It's a very broad answer to answer why the soldiers accused the Cheyenne of witchcraft.

Regardless of the grain of truth that may exist in Spain introducing the Bamboo Flute to very few tribes, Spain wished to conquer the world. Ceremonies, languages, Indigenous musical styles, and ways of life were all affected by the invaders. Ceremonies? Hidden or now lost, yet survived in cases. Languages? Pronunciation or now lost, yet survived in cases. Indigenous musical styles? Musical influence from the "Church" modes. Ways of life? Gone as entire tribal entities when comparing past and present in the United States and in Canada; furthermore, try imagining what the above would now be if the invaders had never come. Indigenous population(s) who have been unmolested worldwide would be an exception, but the former and the latter previously mentioned affected cultural aspects and most likely unaffected cultures would require a dissertation. "Columbus was a disease" I heard it once said, as the speaker related how an entire uncommunicating network of different Indigenous tribes no longer do ceremonies to care for Mother Earth because of the genocide. But I digress even further as I add my thoughts in agreement with this (emphasis mine).


Source

Whether it’s pentatonic mode plus a note, or Dorian mode minus a note, or the six note Raga Mahohari mode, such labels are attempts to contemporize the Native American Flute.



The flute was used for courting within relevant tribal customs before and during the time of being actively hunted; it was used for personal expression; it was used for ceremonial purposes. Why is it that today some want to interpret the notes the earliest flutes may have played in terms of a sliver of music theory - the major scale of which at least 80% of Western music is based?



Source

...most Western music is played in a major key: 97 percent of popular American songs, and 73 percent of classical music is in a major key.


Tunnel vision is being applied to universal sound which is owed to the vibrations of the harmonic series and crosses cultural boundaries as a universal language, but little minds always like things much smaller, don't they? The scissor tail sings the Lydian dominant scale, except just prior to mating. Then he sings the blues scale. Witchcraft indeed.


Source

The brains behind Dreams Kaimin is Dr Takuro Endo, a neurologist who has made a science, and a lucrative CD business, out of selecting the right music to induce sleep. He divides it into three categories: melodies that fire the imagination; those that are calming and relaxing; and music that should, within ten minutes, slow the brain down to the point of unconsciousness.


But a fictitious flute spell is not what needs to be broken. How is it that all these different cultures worldwide developed the flute?


Source

Symbols of the American Indian come down to us in many forms. Some are beaded on elaborate wampum belts, others are found on strips of buffalo hide and more are seen chiseled on stone. Probably the most reliable, in terms of graphic interpretation, are those found in the Southwest commonly called 'rock art'. According to some estimates there are over 50,000 "known" stone petroglyphs and pictographs in the Southwest and West alone. Many more probably exist in remote areas or covered by modern civilization. Certainly, more existed prior to the European invasion.



Source

Flutes are the earliest known musical instruments. A number of flutes dating to about 40,000 to 35,000 years ago have been found in the Swabian Alb region of Germany. These flutes demonstrate that a developed musical tradition existed from the earliest period of modern human presence in Europe.[1]



Source

Kokopelli, ancient humpbacked flute player, is the Southwest's most popular icon. Presented here are more than 300 flute player images, including a great many that have never been published. Along with new information about the meaning and origin of Kokopelli, some of it challenges our current understanding of this unmistakable character. Explore the range of the flute player and see how it extends south into Mexico, north into Canada, west into Nevada, and east into the plains of Colorado, Texas, and Oklahoma.



Source

Flutes made of bamboo are found in many musical traditions.The Gamelan in Indonesia use them.

Some bamboo flutes include:



Source

The Indian flute, one of the oldest instruments of Indian classical music, appears to have developed independently of the western flute. The Hindu god Krishna is said to be a master of the instrument.


How is it that all those different cultures worldwide developed the flute without communicating? My best and only guess, is they "recognized their tune."


Source

Shortly after this research, Maman met French physicist Joel Sternheimer, who discovered the vibratory frequency of elementary particles. Long before the "string theory", Sternheimer was transposing certain molecular structures into musical patterns, creating "the music of the molecules."

Like Maman's cellular research, Sternheimer found that if there was a problem in an organic structure, the molecules of that structure did not vibrate, but if they heard the string of notes they recognized as their tune, they began to vibrate again.


There are no clear specific origins of the flute of any culture, except for the stories sacred to that culture and the obvious elements of the instrument's construction with its cultural usages. What is clear is that each is a unique stylistic interpretation of a universal language, but let the mystery remain of who created it first individually -

Photobucket

or collectively in its birth across the globe.

Photobucket

Some likely have made false claims, but let each unique song be sung and the spell of differentiation be broken - while maintaining the individual integrity of all.


Source

...The earliest possible evidence of Shamanic activity in the Americas comes from the recently excavated Jones-Miller site in Colorado (Stanford 1979). At this Plano kill site, dating to about 8,000 B.C., bison herds were slaughtered, apparently by driving them between ice-glazed snow banks. A post hole was discerned by the excavator, and near it were found an antler flute, a miniature point, and other objects that might have belonged to a Shaman...




Labels: , , , ,

 
by midtowng | 11/14/2009 04:13:00 PM
By any standard measure the suicide of Wesley Everest should be considered unusual.
Everest had only recently returned from the front lines of WWI France, so a suicide isn't all that shocking. However, the circumstances of his death on Veterans Day 1919, should have raised questions with the coroner. That is, if the coroner had bothered to examine the body before declaring it a suicide.

Everest's teeth had been knocked out with a rifle butt. He was then tossed over the side of a bridge several times until his neck was broken from the noose tied around it. Afterward his lifeless body had been shot full of bullets, which is very difficult for a dead man to inflict upon himself.

Perhaps the coroner was just stating that Everest's suicidal action happened long before his death. It happened when he decided to become a member of the Industrial Workers of the World.



Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

"Tell the boys I died for my class."
- Wesley Everest's last recorded words

After the failure of the Patterson Silk Strike of 1913, the east coast IWW mostly collapsed. Into this vacuum arose an IWW active in the coal mines, loading docks, farms, and hobo and logging camps of the western states. Nowhere were they stronger and more active than in the Pacific Northwest.
In the summer of 1916 this led to a confrontation.

The Everett Massacre

On May 1, 1916 the Everett Shingle Weavers Union went on strike. The IWW had no direct affiliation with the shingle weavers, but their philosophy was to support the working class in all its struggles.
When I.W.W. organizer and speaker James Rowan arrived in Everett on June 31, 1916, Everett became the home of the I.W.W.'s newest "Free-Speech Fight". This fight started relatively peacefully. Perhaps purposely, the I.W.W. speakers chose to speak at the corner of Hewitt and Wetmore, a corner where public speaking was illegal, although it was legal at other corners. At first, the speakers were merely arrested and released.
The Everett jail was kept full and the sheriff busy. Eventually the speakers were deported to Seattle instead of just released. The weavers strike was eventually settled at every mill but one - the Jamison Mill.
Until August 19, 1916, the strike had been peaceful. It wasn't meant to last. Strikebreakers, hired by one of the mill owners, Neil Jamison, attacked the picketers by beating them with clubs. The police, standing by, refused to intervene. When picketers retaliated on the scabs later that day the police did intervene.
The IWW then rented out a union hall in Everett. On August 22, Sheriff McRae closed their hall and ordered them to go to Seattle. The wobblies refused. So over the coming weeks several wobblies were beaten and arrested by the police.

Sheriff McRae made being a member of the IWW illegal in Everett. Wobblies that had been arrested were beaten, and any entering Everett were beaten by the police. The IWW refused to give up.
The worst of these beatings was on October 30, 1916. Forty-one I.W.W. members had come by ferry to Everett, to speak at Hewitt and Wetmore. The Sheriff and his deputies beat these men, took them to Beverly Park, and forced them to run through a gauntlet of 'law and order' officials, armed with clubs and whips.
Despite the serious injuries they sustained, many were forced to walk the 25 miles back to Seattle.
The IWW decided to come back in larger numbers on November 5, 1916.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

260 wobblie members booked a ticket to Everett via the steamer Verona. Forty more came on the steamer Calista. They planned on having a massive free-speech rally about the events that happened in Beverly Park.
In response, Sheriff McRae and around 200 armed deputies went to the dock to meet the ship.
The Verona arrived first, pulling in along side the dock. McRae asked "Who is your leader?" When he was told "We are all leaders!", he informed passengers they could not land. A single shot was fired, followed by minutes of chaotic shooting. Whether the first shot came from boat or dock was never determined. Passengers aboard the Verona rushed to the opposite side of the ship, nearly capsizing the vessel.
When the ship tilted a railing broke and several wobblies fell into the harbor. There were some weapons aboard the Verona, but most people were unarmed.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

175 bullets struck the pilot house alone. The captain, Chance Wiman, survived by hiding behind a safe. IWW member James Billings forced the ships engineer at gunpoint to back out of the dock and return to Seattle.
Five I.W.W. members (Abraham Rabinowitz, Hugo Gerlot, Gus Johnson, Felix Baran and John Looney) were killed, as were two of the deputies (C.O. Curtis and Jefferson Beard). Dozens more from each side were wounded. At least 6 additional I.W.W. members disappeared and were either drowned after falling overboard, or shot while in the water.
On the way back to Seattle the Verona passed the Calista and warned them to return to Seattle.
The local Everett wobblies started their rally anyway, and were then arrested and thrown in jail.

Upon reaching Seattle 74 wobblie members were peacefully arrested. Thomas Tracy was to be tried first for conspiracy to commit the murder of Sheriff's Deputy Jefferson Beard. Originally they were all going to be charged with the murder of Deputy C.O. Curtis, but it was discovered that Curtis had been shot in the back by other deputies.

The Tracy trial went on for months. Wobbly trial lawyer Charles Vanderveer demanded a reenactment of the events, which showed how impossible it would have been to identify from the shore who fired a shot. Tracy was acquitted of all charges, and shortly after all charges against the other 73 defendants were dropped.
No charges were ever brought against Sheriff McRae or the deputies. The national guard was moved into Everett and Seattle, and the local authorities tried to pretend it never happened.

"Timber Beasts"

Instead of taking the Everett Massacre as a reason to back down, the IWW organized a massive statewide logger's strike just 8 months later. The strike's objectives were an 8-hour day, improved sanitary conditions, and a union hall.
The strike had mixed results, but it did organize the logging industry and had some improvement in working hours and conditions. One of the workers effected by the labor struggle was a logger named Wesley Everest.

Despite successes like these, the roots of the IWW's demise were already set in stone - their opposition to wars.
The IWW believed that war was a struggle between capitalists where the rich get richer, and the poor die. Just before America's declaration of war, the IWW issued this proclamation: "Capitalists of America, we will fight against you, not for you! There is not a power in the world that can make the working class fight if they refuse."

The public, whipped into a nationalistic frenzy, strongly disagreed with the IWW's stand. IWW organizer Frank Little was strongly opposed to the war, and was lynched just four months after America's entry into the war.
The government used the war as an excuse to crack down on the radical labor union (and any open dissent) using the Espionage Act. 165 IWW leaders were arrested for opposing the draft and given long prison sentences. The union never fully recovered, and the repression didn't end even after the war did.

The Centralia Massacre

Wobblies in Centralia, Washington tried to open a union hall in 1917, but the landlord evicted them when he discovered their identity. However, the following year they succeeded in opening a hall.
During the Red Cross Parade in 1918, a group from the American Legion broke off from the parade and ransacked the union hall. The wobbly members where then removed from their hall by force, beaten and humiliated, and thrown out of town.
The IWW claims this was arranged by business owners who hired thugs. The American Legion and Elks Club said it was just locals who thought the IWW was seditious and un-American. Either way the IWW swore they would never be evicted that way again.
The IWW reopened its union hall in the old Roderick Hotel.

The Armistice Day Parade route that began at 2 p.m. on November 11, 1919, snaked through downtown Centralia and went right in front of the Roderick Hotel. The IWW members, expecting another attack, had armed themselves in advance. Rumors of a repeat of the Red Cross Parade attack were so pervasive that the owner of the Roderick Hotel had asked for assistance from the local sheriff, but was turned down.
What exactly happened when the parade reached the IWW hall is hopelessly disputed, except that it ended in the quick death of three of the Legionnaires — Warren Grimm, Arthur McElfresh and Ben Cassagranda.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Warren Grimm was a leader of the local branch of the American Legion. He was also a veteran of the American Expeditionary Force Siberia where he had fought Bolsheviks firsthand. He was known to be strongly anti-IWW because of their socialist leanings. He led the Centralia American Legion and gave the order to pause in front of the IWW hall.
He was also the first one to die.

According to the Legionnaires, Grimm was shot in middle of the street by a high powered rifle of Wobbly Eugene Barnett, stationed in the Avalon Hotel across the street. Legionnaire McElfresh, standing nearby, was hit next.
In response to this apparent ambush, the Legion members charged the Roderick Hotel.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

According to IWW testimony, the Legionnaires charged the union hall before the first shots were fired. One of the marching veterans, Dr. Frank Bickford, backed up the IWW's claim in written testimony. Other testimony show that Legionnaires were carrying coils of rope with them.
Also, since the main aggressors against the union hall were from the back of group, many of the Legionnaires may have honestly believed they were fired on first. Grimm, standing out in front of the group, was the easiest target.

"I fought for democracy in France and I'm going to fight for it here. The first man that comes in this hall, why, he's going to get it."
- Wesley Everest

What happened next is less disputed. As the Legionnaires kicked down the front door of the hall, two Wobblies inside the hotel shot at their attackers. Legionnaires Bernard Eubanks was shot in the leg while charging the hall and Eugene Pfitzer was hit in the arm.
Wobbly Wesley Everest shot and killed legionnaire Ben Cassagranda inside the hall before he ran out the back to escape the mob. Everest made it as far as the Skookumchuck River, when legionnaire Dale Hubbard caught up with him, pointed a gun, and demanded he surrender.
Everest, standing in middle of the river, turned and shot and killed Hubbard and seriously wounded legionnaire John Watt. Unable to ford the river because it was so high, Everest returned to the river bank where the mob descended on him while he tried to reload his weapon.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Centralia Victims

Several wobblies had hid in a storage locker and surrendered without a fight. The contents of the hall were taken out into the street and burned.
Everest was taken to jail. He had still not given them his name.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Centralia police station; Everest's body being moved

That night someone cut the power to downtown. A mob broke into the prison, pulled Everest from his cell, and lynched him. Neither city undertaker would accept Everest's body, so it was taken back to prison where the prisoners made his coffin.
No one was ever prosecuted for the lynching.
In the growing hysteria, anyone with even vague I.W.W. connections or leanings was jailed. In the search for Wobblies, two groups of vigilantes, each unaware of the other group, converged on an empty cabin. Each group believed that the other group were Wobblies, exchanged gunfire, and John Haney was killed.
...
The US Attorney advised holding all suspected I.W.W. members throughout the nation on federal charges. Washington soon passed a law making it illegal to belong to the I.W.W. Many feared that the Centralia Massacre, as it had come to be known, was a planned piece of a larger conspiracy.
The outcome of the trial of 10 Wobbly members that followed was decided even before it started.
All motions to move the trial, to trial the defendants separately, or to discuss events leading up to the massacre were rejected. Ex-servicemen were given the right to wear their uniforms in court.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Centralia Defendants

After six weeks of testimony, the jury acquitted Elmer Smith and Mike Sheehan, found Loren Roberts guilty but insane, and found the others guilty of third degree murder. The judge rejected this verdict, saying there was no such thing as third degree murder.
The jury was sent back and returned two days later with the same verdict, but convicting the remaining seven defendants of second degree murder. All 12 jurors petitioned the judge requesting leniency for the convicted men.
The judge rejected the petition and handed down sentences for the eight guilty men of 25 to 40 years in prison, far longer than the typical 10 year sentences for second degree murder. The Legionnaires thought the sentences were too weak.
All attempts at appeals were rejected. Four of the jurors later recanted their verdicts on the grounds that they feared repercussions on their family if they didn't vote for guilt.

Wobbly James McInerney died while in prison. Two defendants were paroled in 1931. Three more in 1933. By 1939 they were all out of prison.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/13/2009 12:01:00 PM
It's Friday the 13th! If you are paraskevidekatriaphobic, you're slowing economic recovery. So, get back to work you loafer.

I'll be at an eCitizenship initiative this week, so this "rambling" will be pretty light.


Still, follow me . . .




The White House chef is a history major, University of Chicago, 2004.






On the market?






It looks like the final version of "Race to the Top" will be slightly improved [sub required, new window] from what had originally been proposed.






More schools ought to place academics over athletics. And not just for financial survival.





Whither the food fight [sub required, new window]?





NSSE has always struck me as not far removed from water witching. Researchers seem to agree.






A quick follow-up to my earlier rambling about the "Yes Men." In this older interview they explain their prank on the Chamber of Commerce.

They showed up as soon as these defections started happening. We planned this about a week and a half ago. The Chamber's absurd stance is really what inspired us, of course. The US is the one thing that's holding up the talks in Copenhagen and we have to send Obama to Copenhagen with a climate bill; even though the Kerry-Boxer one isn't great, it's something. And the chamber is opposing climate change legislation and the whole rest of the world is saying we need to do something. Even a lot of big companies are saying we need to do something. The chamber, representing the biggest and stodgiest and most powerful corporations in America is just saying, "Nah, let's let the whole planet go to rot." We just wanted to show what it would look like if they didn't take that absurd stance. And none of the reporters in the room were really surprised.


Now there's the inevitable followup asking if this has all jumped the shark.





History grads have known for quite a while that the swamped job market has meant that teaching at a 2-year college has gotten more competitive, and now pretty much requires a PhD. Even so, the profession has tended to look down on historians at 2-year institutions. That's unfortunate.

Now it turns out that getting into them is becoming even more competitive for students [subscription required]. I notice that this is mostly about New York which, like California, has a 2-year system that is more of a "junior college" system than a refuge for high school underachievers, new immigrants, and people killing time (as was the one where I taught).





Free speech isn't free speech if it's not for everyone, even if I don't agree with it. But what about freedom of the <student> press?





Professors are on strike, and are threatening a no-confidence vote. Do those kinds of votes matter anymore?






The beer of the week? Well, I'm in Detroit this week. First, this place is in bad shape. Bad shape. The recession in Detroit, which I've read about, is much worse in plain sight. It's amazing.

But this is a working-class town. Deeply blue collar. Some of the beer reflects this, but others are more upscale. I had an Arcadia beer the other day. Now, this is a Battle Creek company, not Detroit, but it's close.

I had the Angler's Ale. It was horrible. In fact when the waitress asked how it was I said "garbage." From a slick mouthfeel that might have been an over-soaped glass, to a harsh aftertaste, I absolutely did not like this beer. Generally, the reviews seem to agree.

Other of their beer looks interesting, and I may try a bottled version. But for now, I won't be having this on tap again any time soon.


Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/12/2009 02:02:00 PM
I'm at a conference on "eCitizenship" this week.

This three-year initiative is a partnership of AASCU and the Center for the Study of Citizenship at Wayne State University. Still in the beginning phases, the participating thirty-four institutions in this initiative will work together to study how emerging technologies, particularly social networks, support and facilitate civic and political engagement. The main goal of the initiative to provide insights into and strategies for engaging undergraduates in the use of social networks and technology tools for civic purposes. Those strategies can then be broadly employed to prepare undergraduates for lives of engagement and participation.


Fascinating stuff, and it's going to take a while to process it. Meantime, the tweets have been coming in here. Hopefully the video streaming will be archived here.

I've been particularly impressed by a few things.





There are a lot of men and women of different ages and colors. And they're all using so-called social media in some form or another. Some, like me, use it a great deal. From near-constant Facebooking and instant messaging, to blogging, to using Blackboard's content management system, other things, I am online a lot. Others are on social media sites very rarely, and mostly use e-mail and the "old" Web.

So this is a mix of stuff where I'm thinking "wow, I didn't know about that site" (Diigo, Mashable, &c), "I didn't know about that theoretical stuff on how to teach this stuff," and also round table discussions about the role of electronic media in fostering civic engagement.

Other stuff is incredibly mundane--right now someone is showing the crowd how to block personal information from Facebook friends, another is going to talk about Second Life.

But I'm learning a great deal about how this stuff might translate into the classroom and learning a lot about how people see this working, or not working, in our democracy.

I'm also seeing a great deal of wide-eyed cheerleading for things that aren't always there. For example, speaker after speaker has touted the use of Facebook as a way to promote civic engagement. And each one of them has pointed out that Facebook currently has 300 million or so users. OK, that's true. But in reality, nobody reaches all 300 million users, and most people are only going to reach a very small subset of that group.

Another problem arises within that. Take a moment and look at your friend list on Facebook, or the people who follow you on your Twitter feed if you have that. I'm betting that most of your Facebook friends are people who think mostly like you do. There's an application in Facebook to aggregate that data, actually. If you use it, check especially the percentage of your friends who share your political views.

Once again, much of this is about potential. But more so this is about new technology for an old media.

That is, in its way, a blog is something like an old colonial-era broadside but with better distribution. Many people published broadsides and left blank pages at the end for people to leave comments. I wonder, as a percentage of the population actually reached, where something like the Huffington Post would stand with regard to Common Sense. HuffPo probably reaches more, but it certainly is less topically focused.

Speaking of HuffPo, José Vargas has been the featured speaker here. He's a super-high energy guy with some really interesting ideas about blogging, "citizen journalism," and the way that blogs can shape, or be shaped, by public input. His talk was interesting and I hope will be on the streaming archives linked above.

Far more interesting with him was a small group discussion about the meaning of "citizen journalism," and how this is either good or bad for the way that people get news. Talking with him has been great, and I hope that he can get the HuffPo folks to start and education section on their site. It would be helpful.

In all, it's been an interesting few days. I don't usually enjoy this kind of all-day seminar stuff. Usually it's not all that educational. This one has been different and has brought out some very promising stuff.


Labels: , , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/10/2009 05:10:00 AM
What's on your mind? Me, I'm thinking about the middle-semester crush of grading, meetings, conferences, and &c.





Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/06/2009 12:01:00 PM
This will be a relatively short entry. It's that time of the semester, when grading comes crushing down, and conferences serve to distract.

I'm at the Southern Historical Association annual meeting this week. Drop me an e-mail if you want to get together.

Follow me below for abbreviated ramblings . . .




Harvard's getting picked on a lot in the news, but much of this is deserved. Why not re-think how to spend money to bring up the needy, high achieving students?

Harvard’s program, for example, guarantees that students from families with incomes between $120,000 and $180,000 pay no more than 10 percent of their family’s income to obtain a Harvard education ($180,000 puts one at about the top 10 percent of all families in the country). At this year’s cost of $52,000, this means that Harvard gives every one of these families a grant ranging from $34,000 to $40,000. Yale’s limit of $200,000 reaches families at the 95th percentile.

Few would argue that students from low- and middle-income families should not benefit from the sizable endowments still held by these universities. But no definition of “middle income” would include families in the top 5 or 10 percent of all in the nation.








92 Historical Interviews You Can Watch on YouTube.






Media Matters maintains a database that tracks funding of the conservative astroturf movement. I don't know if I'm happy that this information is out there, or depressed to see who's doing the funding.






Sit up, take notice.





Anti-Vets? Check!

Screwing the unemployed? Check!

Utter contempt for the uninsured? Check!

Contempt for rape victims? Check!

Whackadoole spokesperson? In spades!

Welcome to the modern Republican party.




Beer of the week? Well, I'm in Louisville this week, so the natural choice would be the Bluegrass Brewing Company. I visited the pub yesterday, and the stuff on tap is really, really good. Most particularly the Bourbon Barrel Oatmeal Stout is an amazingly rich stout, and quite complex. Each sip clearly had both the rich maltiness of a stout, the hint of base oatmeal, but incredible undertones of bourbon. I was also impressed with some of their other offerings as well.

I have to say, though, that I'm not sure this is a beer that travels well. When I buy it 100 miles down the road, the bottled stuff isn't as good. Kentucky has some strange laws regarding alcohol sales, including one that states that beer sold in Kentucky must go to Lexington and then be shipped around the state. This includes beer that is made in Kentucky. So my local brewery has to ship beer to Lexington, then back to my town in order to sell it locally. If it wasn't stored properly, of course, the flavor characteristics would be killed.

Anyway, enjoy your beer this week.