by AndrewMc | 6/08/2009 08:27:00 PM

For some months now we have followed the progress of the allegations and investigations into the troubles at the Office of the Historian at the Department of State.

PH has published articles here, and here.

There now seems to be some kind of resolution of the issue.




The Washington Post [free subscription required] reports that
The head of the State Department's Office of the Historian has been reassigned after an inspector general's investigation found "serious mismanagement for which the director must be held accountable."

The office has been the subject of several years of internal and external conflict. A report by Harold W. Geisel, acting State Department inspector general, said the turmoil could be resolved only with the transfer of the historian, Marc J. Susser.



The paper goes on to say that

Although it has not been publicly announced, John Campbell, a former ambassador to Nigeria, has been designated acting director of the office, according to an internal State Department memorandum.


While the entire incident is regrettable, and a bit of a blemish [IMHO] on the fine work that that office does, I'm very glad to see that the State Department seems to have worked things out, and is moving forward.

The FRUS series is an invaluable tool for historians, and any delays in its publication hold up the ability of researchers and the general public to have a close look at U.S. foreign policy decisions.

So, I'm glad that we seem to be moving past this.

Labels: , , , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 2/14/2009 09:28:00 AM
Over the past month there has been an extensive and somewhat spirited discussion of the future of the Foreign Relations of the United States series published by the State Department's Office of the Historian. Jeremy originally brought this to the attention of Progressive Historians in an open thread, and a lively discussion followed.


Over the past few days there has been some movement on this issue.




According to an article published by the Federation of American Scientists,


A management crisis in the State Department Office of the Historian threatens the future of the official “Foreign Relations of the United States” (FRUS) series that documents the history of U.S. foreign policy, according to a newly disclosed report on the situation.


The article goes on to note that


But on closer inspection, the report makes at least two crucial points. First, it confirms that the crisis is real. Out of several dozen people who were interviewed and consulted, “only a single person suggested that there was no crisis, no problem beyond what is normal in an office.”

Second, regardless of who may be to blame, “we believe that effective management is the responsibility of the managers, not the managed….” In other words, the Office leadership, including the Historian himself, has failed to manage the Office in an appropriate manner.



This doesn't sound like the end of the issue, of course, and it would be a shame to see a valuable publication such as FRUS suffer the consequences of this problem. I look forward to seeing continued discussion of this matter here and in other areas.





One final note: Progressive Historians takes anonymity seriously. I want to remind readers that people post anonymously for a variety of reasons, many of which are not immediately apparent. For some, it is their very anonymity that makes it possible for them to speak out on the issues that they do.

In that regard, people who post anonymously should feel that they can post without fear that anyone who manages this site will "out" them, and without the fear that any other poster will attempt to guess their identity. Finally, people who contact me off-list should also be assured that I will keep their identities confidential, but that I will also treat any information I am given with the normal amount of skepticism that one would expect of an analytical researcher.



Labels: , ,