by AndrewMc | 3/05/2010 11:59:00 AM
As usual, Frank Rich nails is.

No one knows what history will make of the present — least of all journalists, who can at best write history’s sloppy first draft. But if I were to place an incautious bet on which political event will prove the most significant of February 2010, I wouldn’t choose the kabuki health care summit that generated all the ink and 24/7 cable chatter in Washington. I’d put my money instead on the murder-suicide of Andrew Joseph Stack III, the tax protester who flew a plane into an office building housing Internal Revenue Service employees in Austin, Tex., on Feb. 18. It was a flare with the dark afterlife of an omen.

The modern conservative movement has gone completely batshit crazy, and makes no apologies for it.

Follow me . . .



Rove says this about the questions surrounding the complete lack of any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and therefore the lack of any justification for the war:

"When the pattern of the Democratic attacks became apparent in July 2003, we should have countered in a forceful and overwhelming way," he writes. "We should have seen this for what it was: a poison-tipped dagger aimed at the heart of the Bush presidency."


Hey, Karl? No. It wasn't a "pattern of Democratic attacks." It was a growing recognition that the administration had gotten us into a war on false pretenses, therefore needlessly sacrificing the blood and treasure of the nation. At best it was a horrible mistake. At worst it was criminal in nature. My only regret is that instead of throwing you and your cronies in jail, it seems as if the judgment will be left to subsequent generations.

But, hey, thanks for spelling the name of my political party correctly. It's more than I can say for most Republicans.




There's a movement afoot to repeal the 17th amendment. No, seriously.

Here's the logical from bizarro-land, where history stops in 1789:

Until 1913, when the 17th Amendment was ratified, the citizens of the states elected U.S. senators indirectly: Voters elected the state legislators, and they in turn selected U.S. senators. From 1913 onward, voters have directly elected U.S. senators in statewide elections.

This change has led to a number of negative results, including

-Vastly increased federal power and vastly decreased state, local, and personal authority due to the state governments losing their representation in the federal government;

-The domination of Senate elections (and legislation) by forces outside of the particular states wherein elections are being held, e.g., out-of-state donations, political party operatives, and campaign consultants; and

-A decline of the influence of individual voters and small, local associations of voters over who is selected to be a senator from their state.





Two weeks ago I wrote about Don McLeroy, the Texas State Board of Education rep who was singlehandedly, and gleefully, re-writing history. On Tuesday he lost the primary to get reelected. A sliver of sanity from the Lone Star state.





Head 'em up, and move 'em out.




On the one hand, if it's a private institution, they have the right to think, teach, and run their college in any way they want:

Erskine is part of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, which describes itself as conservative and evangelical -- well to the right, on political and social issues, of other Presbyterian churches. The ARP (as members call it) is also small, with only 250 churches, so a requirement that all faculty or students at its only college be church members wouldn't yield enough people qualified to enroll or teach. The college has required all faculty members to be Christians, and students of all faiths have been welcome -- with only a minority of students and faculty members coming from the ARP.

This week, however, church leaders will gather to discuss a special report they commissioned about Erskine, which has been well regarded academically for its liberal arts programs, but which critics fear has strayed from its founding faith. The report has not been finalized or formally released, but some faculty members have seen it, as have some outside the college. The report is seemingly most critical of the church leaders themselves, saying that they have been "negligent" in overseeing the college. But the reasons given for why this negligence is faulted have many faculty members scared.


On the other hand, why on earth would they jeopardize faculty retention?





Man, I'd love to believe this is true.




No wonder I feel like I'm not getting enough sleep.






Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 2/26/2010 11:01:00 AM
Hahahahahahahaha.

Welcome to Friday. Today is the birthday of the Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona, and the subway in New York City.

Follow me.



I've used this space a few times to highlight the ongoing media debate about the value of a college degree. In fact, hardly a week goes by without one article or another questioning whether or not a college degree has value.

Most of that discussion, as I've said in the past, implies that the value of a college degree is in the monetary reward of whatever job a student gets after they graduate. Personally, I feel that this completely ignores the point of a college education.

The point is to prepare people to be active and engaged citizens of this republic. For that, students need to have a liberal arts education with a core curriculum that exposes them to a broad range of ideas and allows them to discuss and debate those ideas in an open and unfiltered manner.

It also requires that they grow and mature as people during their college education.

That's why this trend is not good:

First:
Dozens of public high schools in eight states will introduce a program next year allowing 10th graders who pass a battery of tests to get a diploma two years early and immediately enroll in community college.


And then:
In an era when college students commonly take longer than four years to get a bachelor's degree, some U.S. schools are looking anew at an old idea: slicing a year off their undergraduate programs to save families time and money.


This is "education as assembly line." Get students through as quickly as possible so they can get a job. It completely ignores the role of higher education as a facilitator of an educated citizenry. It's education on the cheap, with the main goal being to save time and money, and to bring out a product [a diploma] quickly and efficiently.

Education isn't supposed to be quick and efficient.




Majoring in sex, drugs, rock 'n roll.




I'm going to be the pilot on the next shuttle mission. Then I'm going to get a job as a programmer at Apple. After that, I think I'll take command of the 101st Airborne division. To wrap up a busy career, I think maybe I'll conduct cancer research at Scripps Hospital. Maybe I'll get my friend Bob Sacamano to help. No problem.




I have several students who self-identify as Tea-Partiers. My surprise is that I don't have more. In fact, the only good thing about the general apathy of of my students is that it means that the College Republicans don't do very much.

I realize that Teabaggers need to have a populace that is as uneducated as possible. Well, let me go back for a second. Tea Partiers themselves seem to be pretty well educated. But those are the self-styled leaders of the party. What they need is for voters to be as uneducated as possible. How else will they get them to swallow all the crap that comes out of the mouths of people like Mark Williams.

So, their non-stop meddling is bad enough. But this is more worrisome.

As if the recession had not given community college advocates enough to worry about, some fear that the anti-tax sentiment stirred by Tea Party activists could endanger their federal, state and local funding.

One Tea Party group in New Jersey is questioning Warren County Community College's plans to open a satellite campus, meant to accommodate the institution's burgeoning enrollment in outlying areas and free up space on its main campus. As required by New Jersey law, half of the $7.3 million bond to buy and renovate a commercial building for the new campus would be paid from an existing pool of state funds. The remainder, officials say, would be paid for by leasing additional space in the renovated building to interested tenants.






This seems like a "duh?" moment, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised when it happens.

A Montgomery County teacher has agreed to apologize to a 13-year-old student whom he reprimanded and sent to the office for twice refusing to stand during the Pledge of Allegiance, said a lawyer who represents the student.





It's about time.





We're reading Rick Perlstein's "Who Owns the Sixties" in class this week, so this piece at Salon is especially timely. I'm intrigued by the idea of the Teabaggers as "countercultural," especially given the unceasing argument that America is essentially a conservative nation. Me, I'd go with labeling them "disaffected loonies." But that's me.

Still, there's something to be said for the idea that

Street theater. Communes. Manifestoes. Denunciations of "the system." The counterculture is back. Only this time it's on the right.

Political factions that are out of power have a choice. They can form a counter-establishment or a counterculture. A counter-establishment (a term that Sidney Blumenthal used to describe the neoconservatives in the 1970s) seeks to return to power by reassuring voters that it is sober and responsible. A counter-establishment publishes policy papers and holds conferences and its members endure their exile in think tanks and universities.

In contrast, a counterculture refuses to acknowledge the legitimacy of the rules of the game that it has lost. Instead of moving toward the center, the counterculture heads for the fringes. Like a cult, it creates its own parallel reality, seceding from a corrupt and wicked society into morally and politically pure enclaves.





The words "disaffected loonies" doesn't even begin to cover this.

THE .50 CALIBER Bushmaster bolt action rifle is a serious weapon. The model that Pvt. 1st Class Lee Pray is saving up for has a 2,500-yard range and comes with a Mark IV scope and an easy-load magazine. When the 25-year-old drove me to a mall in Watertown, New York, near the Fort Drum Army base, he brought me to see it in its glass case—he visits it periodically, like a kid coveting something at the toy store. It'll take plenty of military paychecks to cover the $5,600 price tag, but he considers the Bushmaster essential in his preparations to take on the US government when it declares martial law.

His belief that that day is imminent has led Pray to a group called Oa/th Kee/pers, one of the fastest-growing "patriot" organizations on the right.


Here's the main clue that these people are way more "anti-Obama" than they are concerned with defending the Constitution:

Most of the men's gripes revolve around policies that began under President Bush but didn't scare them so much at the time. "Too many conservatives relied on Bush's character and didn't pay attention," founder Rho/des told me. "Only now, with Obama, do they worry and see what has been done. I trusted Bush to only go after the terrorists. But what do you think can happen down the road when they say, 'I think you are a threat to the nation?'"



This is the typical behavior of people who support dictators: Absolute power is OK when my allies exercise it.

The test for handing power to someone, anyone, is "would I be OK if my political opponents had the same power?" If the answer is "no" then you don't do it. It's simple.




I love the idea of this:

It is a grand vision: a global college with no tuition, accessible to anyone with an Internet connection.

When the higher education entrepreneur Shai Reshef laid out his ambitious plan to build a free university that would use modern technology to spread the promise of a college degree to all corners of the earth, he got an enthusiastic reaction from some high-profile institutions. The United Nations has backed the venture. So has Yale Law School’s Information Society Project. Reshef and his lieutenants also like to mention the many letters of support and offers to pitch in from professors worldwide.


It gets right to the very ideal of a liberal education: it should be open to all. But the hard reality is that a liberal education is subject to the market. Universities raise tuition, loans are hard to get, and states generally have little interest in funding higher education in a meaningful way. Too bad.

And,
Questions about the so-called University of the People abounded: How do you build quality programs without charging tuition? How effective would the project’s peer-to-peer pedagogical model be in classrooms of students from vastly different cultural and educational traditions? Who would accredit such an operation at a time when the perceived value -- even necessity -- of a postsecondary education is ascendant in virtually every country? Reshef’s heart seems to be in the right place. But is his head?


I don't know that this thing will succeed. After all, many universities already provide free online classes to anyone with a computer.

We'll see.




In class today we are tasting a range of chocolate stouts. Young's was the first I ever had. It reminds me of liquid chocolate cake. Great flavor--it's deep and mellow.

It falls into the "Spice, Herb, or Vegetable Beer" category for the Beer Judge Certification Program. From a judging standpoint this category is wide-open, and it gives brewers a great deal of flexibility.

Have a good weekend.


Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 2/19/2010 12:01:00 PM
Whew! It's been a while. Between the weird pressure of preparing for the new semester, and a new job (well, a new job within an old job), and a few other things, I've been absolutely slaughtered.

Lucky you; I'm back. And Friday Ramblings are, too. Follow me.





Conservatives will tell you there's no right to privacy. What about this?

According to the filings in Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District (PA) et al, the laptops issued to high-school students in the well-heeled Philly suburb have webcams that can be covertly activated by the schools' administrators, who have used this facility to spy on students and even their families. The issue came to light when the Robbins's child was disciplined for "improper behavior in his home" and the Vice Principal used a photo taken by the webcam as evidence. The suit is a class action, brought on behalf of all students issued with these machines.


That's just ridiculous. And I'm wondering who the Einstein was who sat down with the IT people and said "Oh, by the way, set the laptop up so I can look into the students' houses when I want to."

If true, that's about as stupid as it gets.




There was a time when the United States actually prosecuted people for this sort of thing.

Nowadays we apparently don't think it's a crime.





I'm sorry, but are you kidding me? Female genital mutilation in Iraq? The look on her face says it all.

Disgusting. Even more disgusting that it's occurring in a country we've occupied for all these years.





Here's something interesting, as reported at IHE and Huffington Post:

Someone is making a documentary that is apparently highly critical of the late Senator Edward Kennedy. It will be from the same producer—a man with close ties to prominent conservatives—who makes the series 24.

Some liberal historians are angry, and have begun a website to petition the History Channel not to air the program.

I understand their issue. If the History Channel airs the programs, it will be seen by millions of people, especially college students. We'll spend years, if not decades, trying to correct the misinformation out there. In some ways, the History Channel is becoming the first draft of history.

Funny thing is, while that website asks for signatures on a petition, and for monetary donations to the cause, I couldn't find anywhere that it actually links to the offending script in order to allow readers to decide for themselves whether or not the script is as offensive as they claim.

Those folks may be right, but there's no way I'm signing a petition or giving you money if I can't see what it is you're objecting to.




You know what I like about South Carolina? There's never any shortage of teh crazy.

South Carolina will no longer recognize U.S. currency as legal tender, if State Rep. Mike Pitts has his way.

Pitts, a fourth-term Republican from Laurens, introduced legislation earlier this month that would ban what he calls “the unconstitutional substitution of Federal Reserve Notes for silver and gold coin” in South Carolina.

If the bill were to become law, South Carolina would no longer accept or use anything other than silver and gold coins as a form of payment for any debt, meaning paper money would be out in the Palmetto State.


Shades of nullification, eh?






Want to know why history matters? Look no further than this article in the New York Times Magazine. It's frightening.

[Texas School Board member Don] McLeroy moved that Margaret Sanger, the birth-control pioneer, be included because she “and her followers promoted eugenics,” that language be inserted about Ronald Reagan’s “leadership in restoring national confidence” following Jimmy Carter’s presidency and that students be instructed to “describe the causes and key organizations and individuals of the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.” The injection of partisan politics into education went so far that at one point another Republican board member burst out in seemingly embarrassed exasperation, “Guys, you’re rewriting history now!” Nevertheless, most of McLeroy’s proposed amendments passed by a show of hands.


The one thing that gives me some kind of cold, cold comfort is that state budgets are so bad right now that school boards may turn to more online sources, and away from publishers. The influence of the Texas School Board may simply hasten that, leaving Texas as even more of a backwoods, Neanderthal relic of pre-modern thinking.




Here's a nice piece on the history of slavery at Mammoth Cave.




Just as the punditocracy begins to whine that we're killing too many terrorists, and therefore ruining the war on terrorism . . . .

. . . . hold on. Seriously?! Am I really reading that Obama's version of the War on Terror(™) sucks because he's killing them? The only thing more screwy than that is that Democrats aren't on every single talk show saying "You're kidding, right? They don't want us to kill terrorists? Who's side are they on, anyway?"

OK, anyway. Where was I? Oh yeah.

Just as the punditocracy begins to whine that we're killing too many terrorists, and therefore ruining the war on terrorism, we hear of some major victories.

A top Taliban commander in Pakistan has been captured (which might have been lagniappe), as has another in Oman, and another in Pakistan.

This adds to many others killed in various kinds of strikes. And it seems to be working.




As if college being more expensive wasn't hard enough, now it's becoming harder to get a loan.




Well, if they can't get a loan to go, perhaps there are other incentives for the nation's increasingly-endangered male college students.

In all seriousness though, more people are paying attention to the increasing gender gap in colleges.




This is moderately funny.

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – In the wake of his comments about the earthquake in Haiti, televangelist Pat Robertson has become a “public relations nightmare” and a “gynormous embarrassment to me, personally,” God said today.


Except that the "ironic interviews with god" genre has already been done so well, that even now it's a hard act to top.




OK, this is good news on the progressive front:

Washington, D.C. – Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, praised an independent committee at the Department of Defense for adding emergency contraception (EC) to the list of medications made available to servicemembers overseas. Approximately 350,000 women serve in the military or depend on military facilities for their health care abroad.


But I have to say, when this is the good news we're celebrating—that we'll graciously allow women to purchase contraception—we're probably losing the battle.




There's a difference between climate and weather.




The proliferation of free online courses is an interesting trend.






Beer of the week:


You haven't heard of Brew Dog beer? Not surprising. Their beers are mainly available in the UK, and even there are premium beers, and not widely available in the U.S. I've had their Paradox Imperial Stout and the Hardcore IPA.

I enjoyed both. But the article about their Sink the Bismark beer at Huffington Post really caught my eye.


Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 12/04/2009 12:01:00 PM
I have the feeling that the country is on the edge of historic health care reform that will fundamentally transform the nation, moving us forward in ways that we can't quite envision.

Either that, or we're in for Epic Fail.


Anyone else tired of the Obama/LBJ comparisons? Follow me.



The "Obama-as-LBJ" meme is getting an amazing amount of play in the press, although it started literally the day before the election. And continued right after.

But here's a truncated list:

NPR: LBJ Arm-Twisting? Not Really Obama's Style

"Noted Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin [who couldn't possibly have an LBJ-o-philiac horse in the race, right?]": Doris Kearns Goodwin Wants "More LBJ" From Obama When Dealing With Congress

Op-Ed News: "Obama's LBJ Moment"

The American Spectator: "Obama's LBJ Syndrome"

CNN: "Five Questions for Obama on Afghan War"

That doesn't even count the blogosphere, where LBJ-Obama comparisons grow like weeds in spring. It's amazing. And it's an awful comparison for a number of reasons. Heck, even the American Spectator made the point.

Let me say that I understand why reporters like it: it's easy. It takes very little effort to make the connection, because you don't need to do any research whatsoever. You can easily, and unthinkingly equate elements of major events in both administrations:

Afghanistan? Easy! It's just like Vietnam! Large war with native insurgency, no clear strategy for victory, corrupt local puppet government, growing cadre of anti-war groups.

Health Care Reform? Easy! Just like the Great Society programs! Trying to bring health care to more people who can't afford it.

Except it is, of course, not that easy. And I'm not sure that the situation is made any better by the historians advising him, many of whom came of age in the Vietnam anti-war movement during LBJ's presidency. And many of whom have authored books on LBJ, or served on his staff.

I'm gonna get in big trouble for saying this, I'm sure, but more than any other generation, people who grew up in the 1960s have a much greater tendency to see the world through the lens of their own experiences, and to see the 1960s as one of the seminal periods in American history. I disagree, but then again I'm a colonialist. [Obama as Hamilton? as Gibbon? as François Quesnay? Those would require some work, and a populace educated enough to move past their 8th-grade history texts.].

The oversimplification is maddening, disingenuous, and lends a relevance to a time period that may not, in fact, be all that important in this case. Does it hold lessons for us? Yes, of course. Should it be central to our understanding of Afghanistan and health care and financial reform, and all the other things we need to accomplish? I don't think so.

By linking Obama so closely with LBJ in the public mind, we might be creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Anyway, that's my ramble on the subject. Once again, I refer to a wonderful piece "Who Owns the Sixties," which appeared in the old magazine Lingua Franca, which highlights the struggle of historians, and by extension the United States, to get out from under the long shadow of that era.



I taught kindergarten for a while. If I was to teach anywhere but college, this would be it.



Faculty governance is important, even the little things. The number of arguments I've had with administrators here over what "faculty representation" means on a committee. "Faculty Representation" means "someone picked by the duly elected representative body of the faculty [ie. the Faculty Senate], not "someone handpicked by the administration" [ie. some tool who's going to agree with whatever the President wants. It may sound like a small issue, but if administrations want their initiatives to be taken seriously, there has to be true faculty representation.




This is a bit worrisome.




Sanity prevails at Hofstra.

After a comprehensive review, the Board of Trustees has, at my recommendation, voted unanimously to eliminate our intercollegiate football program in order to redirect those resources toward academic initiatives and need-based scholarships.


I love college football. But for some schools it's just not right.




Beer of the week? Yes, Samuel Adams. But no, not the regular Sam Adams Boston Lager in the blue-label bottle that, while good, is now just an ordinary beer.

Instead, I'm thinking of some of the more radical beers that they produce. The picture at left is of the Sam Adams Triple Bock, which came in a small 8 oz. bottle and was produced in the 1990s. This is a gigantic, robust beer with an absolutely astonishing taste. I still have about six or eight of these, and I have about one a year. It's like sipping brandy.

Or, go for a Millennium, a bottle of which sold for nearly $5000 at a charity auction [not to me, unfortunately]. Sam Adams brewed the Millennium for the Y2K celebrations, and only made 3000 bottles of it. You can still find them occasionally on eBay, where they go for about $1000. The style of beer insures that it will store and age for about 10 years. It's a 40-proof beer, so you'll only need one.

You could also try a Utopia, a 25% abv beer. They go for a few hundred a bottle, last I checked.

Closer to a normal price range is the Sam Adams Chocolate Bock, which sells in many liquor and grocery stores. It's got a very rich flavor. For a beer that I'd agree is only "decent" it is a bit pricey.

Or, simply go for one of the many, many "normal" beers they make.





Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/20/2009 12:01:00 PM
It's Friday. Ramble on!



Whew. What a week. Follow me on below . . .



A decades-long shift in university governance away from faculty toward administrators means that faculty have a much weaker voice than ever. With budget cuts and shrinking lines, it is critically important for university faculty to organize, organize, organize.

Along those lines:

Last year, Willamette University took a step toward reducing tensions surrounding the budget. As we planned for the current year, we faced the high degree of uncertainty that the financial crisis has forced on many universities. We dealt with this situation by shifting from planning a fixed budget to planning a flexible one. The process required to design this more elaborate plan resulted in unusually deep discussion between faculty members and administrators about which high-priority items needed to be included in the “base” budget and which could be deferred pending receipt of the revenue that might be generated by higher enrollment. Contingency plans were thus devised and discussed before we incorporated them into the budget.


This is a good idea, and one that I hope spreads to other institutions. Faculty have a wealth of experience in a variety of disciplines. Use it.






On the "let's ruin education" front:

Note:

In the past decade or so, the practice of faculty governance has become increasingly vexed by the proliferation of special interest research and teaching centers sponsored by outside benefactors who expect to be involved in the content and management of programs they pay for. University administrations, strapped for resources and hungry for fame, have found it difficult to turn down any offer of support for teaching and research, even if it comes with ideological mandates.



It spans disciplines:

In the new audit, the inspector general [for the Department of Health and Human Services] reviewed data from the federal government's 2006 fiscal year and found universities almost always trust scientists to judge whether their stock holdings or payments from outside medical companies pose any conflict of interest.


At my own school we have the "BB&T Professor for the Study of Capitalism." The money for it came from a bank, and one of the conditions is that the professor assign Ayn Rand in his classes. That seems crazy to me, but I'm told that "we need the money."


Meanwhile, out in the "heartland," the University of Nebraska is setting the stage for allowing a political agenda to interfere with the educational process in their own system:

In an unusual pushback against President Obama’s expansion of federal financing of human embryonic stem cell research, the University of Nebraska is considering restricting its stem cell experiments to cell lines approved by President George W. Bush.


That sound you hear, and the smell you notice, is the slow decay of American higher education.





Each year the AHA publishes the latest misery in job numbers, and cautions (explicitly or implicitly) that there are too many PhDs out there competing for jobs. OK, OK, sometimes the news is cautiously optimistic, but the job market is very difficult.

The University of California system just approved a 32% tuition increase. I understand that California has its own unique set of problems, but these things are happening everywhere, and the tuition increases are coming on top of layoffs.

As we head into the interview season in San Diego, we should keep asking ourselves if doctoral programs are doing the right thing by continuing to crank out new PhDs each year. Numbers might have been decent last year, but the recession virtually guarantees that in the next few years the job numbers are going to be awful. Universities will be lucky if all they do is not hire for a few years. Many will be cutting faculty, not just letting lines expire.





I don't use Twitter, but I like the concept, and think it's kind of cool. In fact we're talking about setting up a system here on my campus where the various television monitors around campus [which are used for announcements of various kinds] would display a wiffiti screen that would be full of tweets. Students could then respond to an issues-oriented question by tweeting their answers in, which would then be displayed around campus. The idea is to get students civicly engaged.

Still, I'm not sure it's great for discourse--it's more like modern graffiti, I think. But just so you know, they're passing high-tech notes about you while you're talking.

But then again, some people encourage it.

Cole W. Camplese, director of education-technology services at Pennsylvania State University at University Park, prefers to teach in classrooms with two screens — one to project his slides, and another to project a Twitter stream of notes from students. He knows he is inviting distraction — after all, he’s essentially asking students to pass notes during class. But he argues that the additional layer of communication will make for richer class discussions.


I'm not sure that's such a great idea, but whatever. The person is an IT guy who doesn't regularly teach. So this seems experimental, at best.





Beer of the week? Anchor Steam. First brewed in California in the 1880s, "steam" beer (also known as "California Common") is a patented style, although the process is pretty easy.

There are two main types of yeast for brewing: lager yeast (Saccharomyces uvarum) and ale yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Lager yeast ferments at a low temperature--under 55 degrees Fahrenheit--and at the bottom of the tank. Ale yeast ferments at warmer temperatures--usually between 55 and 75--and at the top of the tank. If the beer is allowed to ferment at higher temperatures, the yeast will produce fusel alcohol in addition to the normal ethyl alcohol. Fusel alcohol is good for some things, but not to drink. It gives beer a solvent-like flavor that is awful.

Steam beer was developed in California, and uses a lager yeast but ferments the sugars at temperatures normally reserved for ale yeasts. In most cases this would give the beer a strong, hot, spicy, solvent flavor. The folks at anchor use a patented strain of yeast, and carefully control the flavor profile with specialty malts and hops.

The result is a strongly-flavored beer that has characteristics of both ale and lager. Yummy.

Why the name "steam?" Nobody's sure, even the people at Anchor.



Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 11/13/2009 12:01:00 PM
It's Friday the 13th! If you are paraskevidekatriaphobic, you're slowing economic recovery. So, get back to work you loafer.

I'll be at an eCitizenship initiative this week, so this "rambling" will be pretty light.


Still, follow me . . .




The White House chef is a history major, University of Chicago, 2004.






On the market?






It looks like the final version of "Race to the Top" will be slightly improved [sub required, new window] from what had originally been proposed.






More schools ought to place academics over athletics. And not just for financial survival.





Whither the food fight [sub required, new window]?





NSSE has always struck me as not far removed from water witching. Researchers seem to agree.






A quick follow-up to my earlier rambling about the "Yes Men." In this older interview they explain their prank on the Chamber of Commerce.

They showed up as soon as these defections started happening. We planned this about a week and a half ago. The Chamber's absurd stance is really what inspired us, of course. The US is the one thing that's holding up the talks in Copenhagen and we have to send Obama to Copenhagen with a climate bill; even though the Kerry-Boxer one isn't great, it's something. And the chamber is opposing climate change legislation and the whole rest of the world is saying we need to do something. Even a lot of big companies are saying we need to do something. The chamber, representing the biggest and stodgiest and most powerful corporations in America is just saying, "Nah, let's let the whole planet go to rot." We just wanted to show what it would look like if they didn't take that absurd stance. And none of the reporters in the room were really surprised.


Now there's the inevitable followup asking if this has all jumped the shark.





History grads have known for quite a while that the swamped job market has meant that teaching at a 2-year college has gotten more competitive, and now pretty much requires a PhD. Even so, the profession has tended to look down on historians at 2-year institutions. That's unfortunate.

Now it turns out that getting into them is becoming even more competitive for students [subscription required]. I notice that this is mostly about New York which, like California, has a 2-year system that is more of a "junior college" system than a refuge for high school underachievers, new immigrants, and people killing time (as was the one where I taught).





Free speech isn't free speech if it's not for everyone, even if I don't agree with it. But what about freedom of the <student> press?





Professors are on strike, and are threatening a no-confidence vote. Do those kinds of votes matter anymore?






The beer of the week? Well, I'm in Detroit this week. First, this place is in bad shape. Bad shape. The recession in Detroit, which I've read about, is much worse in plain sight. It's amazing.

But this is a working-class town. Deeply blue collar. Some of the beer reflects this, but others are more upscale. I had an Arcadia beer the other day. Now, this is a Battle Creek company, not Detroit, but it's close.

I had the Angler's Ale. It was horrible. In fact when the waitress asked how it was I said "garbage." From a slick mouthfeel that might have been an over-soaped glass, to a harsh aftertaste, I absolutely did not like this beer. Generally, the reviews seem to agree.

Other of their beer looks interesting, and I may try a bottled version. But for now, I won't be having this on tap again any time soon.


Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 10/30/2009 12:01:00 PM
I consider myself an environmentalist, despite having once eating whale meat. I was a vegetarian for more than 10 years, and a strict vegan for some of those. And while I again eat meat, I do so rarely and in very small amounts. When my family first moved to San Diego in the early 1970s, when I was but a very young lad, it was still possible to catch yellow fin tuna from the Ocean Beach pier. By the mid-1980s you had to take a boat a few miles off shore.

Now, tuna everywhere are depleted from their historic lows. That's why I'm glad to see studies like this reaching the public consciousness.




Jeremy's call for a panelist reminds me to note that I will be at the Southern Historical Association annual meeting in Louisville next week. I'll also be at the AHA in San Diego. If you are going to be at either meeting and want to get together to say "hi," drop me a line or post a comment.






Someone please explain this to me. Does Jesus really care if you win a football game? Isn't it just as likely that Satan could be involved in sports? Are we to see the bumper stickers reading "WPDWJR" (Which Pass Defense Would Jesus Run)?






On a more serious note, are people paying attention to this? What are your thoughts here?

Congress has not given final approval to legislation ending federal subsidies for private student loans for college. But Secretary of Education Arne Duncan sent a letter Monday to thousands of colleges and universities urging them to get ready to use the government’s Direct Loan Program in the 2010-11 school year.

The House of Representatives last month passed the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, expanding the government’s direct lending and ending the current program of government subsidies and loan guarantees for private lenders. Under that law, all colleges would be required to convert to the federal Direct Loan Program by July 1.






This is an interesting discussion.

And although it pertains to non-college students, it is still applicable. What are your views on instructors revealing their political opinions to students? I poll my students in my 100-level classes after each election, asking them who they thought I had voted for. It usually splits about 50-50.

I don't ask my upper-division students. By the fourth or fifth year, they've been around the department long enough to know me outside of the classroom. They all know by that point.

Your thoughts?






And you thought 8am classes were bad.





The Obama administration is calling for an overhaul of college programs that prepare teachers, saying they are cash cows that do a mediocre job of preparing teachers for the classroom.


No kidding.





Would you submit?

Many colleges now require criminal background checks of all new employees. But the University of Akron -- in what some experts believe is a first -- is not only requiring a criminal background check, but is stating that new employees must be willing to submit a DNA sample.






This will be one of the last postings on this blog. Sorry.





The beer of the week is Schlafly Beer. There are a couple of reasons to like this beer. First, it's got good quality. Second, it's inexpensive--around $7 for a six pack where I live.

Finally, they're succeeding right in the belly of the beast. They're brewing beer in St. Louis, for god sakes. Right under the eye of Sauron! And they're doing it well.

I've not had every beer they make, but I've had most of them. To be sure, these are not world-class beers. They make some very good beer, sure. But this is good sipping beer--hanging out watching a game, sitting with friends, drinking a beer.

On the unusual side, I like their coffee beer, although I'm not a fan of coffee. On the other side, while this reviewer really liked the American Pale Ale, I find that beer to be an example of what's wrong with the American tendency to think that if a bit of something tastes good, then a lot of the same thing must taste better. Way too much hops, which destroy the malt flavor. I think it's all out of balance.

That having been said, their Pilsener, Pale Ale, and Kolsch are all excellent beers.

This are good, low-cost beers and well worth trying, if you haven't already.




Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 10/23/2009 12:01:00 PM
As my seventh birthday approached, my parents asked me what I wanted. There was only one thing. I wanted to be hit in the face with a pie. So, my dad caught me as I came out the door to our place that morning. Then he handed me a pie and said that it was only fair that since he had . . . and I hit him with it. It was a great birthday.

Soupy Sales died Thursday night. I knew without reading the obit that the first line would contain the words "rubber-faced."

I did find one particular part of his obituary very, very strange:

"His parents, owners of a dry-goods store, sold sheets to the Ku Klux Klan."

I dunno, that just struck me as weird.

[by the way, these "Ramblings" should be considered Open Threads.]



Thomas Frank has penned an excellent essay on the loopy fringe conservative movement's takeover of American discourse. He takes Richard Hofstadter's 1964 essay, "The Paranoid Style in American Politics," which all politically literate people ought to read.

Among Frank's gems is:

The paranoid pattern persists regardless. It is impervious to world events; a blurring of the American subconscious that has not changed since Hofstadter analyzed it 45 years ago. Consider the recent wave of fear that the hypnotic Mr. Obama was planning to indoctrinate schoolchildren. In "The Paranoid Style," Hofstadter wrote, "Very often the enemy is held to possess some especially effective source of power: he controls the press; . . . he has a new secret for influencing the mind; ... he is gaining a stranglehold on the educational system."


By the way, markfromireland at Firedoglake's The Seminal has another very good essay placing the current health care debate in the context of Hofstader's essay.





Well, this is disturbing.

A Russian historian investigating the fate of Germans imprisoned in the Soviet Union during the second world war has been arrested, in the latest apparent clampdown on historical research into the Stalin era by the Russian authorities.







I want to use these to teach. But I'm not sure I could get away with it.






I absolutely love what the "Yes Men" are doing. If aren't familiar with them, they're a kind of political-guerrilla satire group. And they're amazingly good at it. In 2004 one of the group, posing as a spokesperson for Dow Chemical, managed to get interviewed by the BBC. In the interview the "spokesman" claimed that Dow was going to take full responsibility for the accident and spend $12 billion to provide health care and clean up costs. See that here.

Their latest prank was to hold a fake Chamber of Commerce press conference announcing that the CoC was going to change its position on climate change.




Priceless.





Oh, good grief. Because this is what should destroy whatever credibility Meghan McCain might have had? Furrfu.

The sad thing is that Meghan McCain is a moron, just on her merits. And this is amply deconstructed here. But it would be a real disservice to the public discourse if what discredits Meghan McCain are her double-d boobs instead of her boob-ish worldview. It will allow conservatives to say "See, we had a real bright star here, and she was trashed by the media."

Instead, it would be good to see more of this. Watch Paul Begala upend her:




Note that her defense at one point (around 1:18) is "You know everything, and I'm just a blond here." There ya have it. She's just a blond Sarah Palin.








Parody, done well, speaks for itself.



Even so, the blogger who made the video explains it.






I realized today that I have old mail from an e-mail account older than the freshmen in my 100-level class. Sigh.

When I signed up for the account, I had to take a form to my then-department head, Roy Rosenzweig, to sign off on it. I was an undergrad. Nobody could figure out why a history major ought to have an e-mail account. I had to swear an oath that I wouldn't abuse the system. We both signed it, and there I was, owner of an account on George Mason's "vax" server. Google has an old Usenet post, of mine, but I don't think it was my first. That would have been earlier. Still, time flies.





The beer of the week is Dogfish Head.


These people make some really good beer, and they make a wide variety of really good beer. I don't always like all of it (case in point), but there are some that I'll have every chance I get.

An example of this is their 60, 90, and 120 Minute IPA beers. The 120 minute is pricey--$7 per bottle where I live--but it's a slow sipping beer, and lasts me quite a while. As the line goes, "This is a bottle with a message in, and the message is 'beware'." It's full-flavored, and high-alcohol.

I especially like Dogfish Head's web page of their brews. Each has a bit of information, as well as suggested food pairings. It's a good guide.

The owner of the brewery, Sam Calagione, has written an excellent book on the process of starting his brewery. It's nice read.

Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 10/16/2009 12:01:00 PM


Four to six years of college, tens of thousands of dollars in debt, and whaddaya get? Nothing.





Bright, eager—and unwanted. While unemployment is ravaging just about every part of the global workforce, the most enduring harm is being done to young people who can't grab onto the first rung of the career ladder.

Affected are a range of young people, from high school dropouts, to college grads, to newly minted lawyers and MBAs across the developed world from Britain to Japan. One indication: In the U.S., the unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds has climbed to more than 18%, from 13% a year ago.


Thanks, George Bush and the Republicans, for the largest unregulated transfer of wealth from the lower and middle classes to the wealthy, ever.

Great job with the economy!

More ramblings below . . .




I'd say "must read," but that's stating the obvious when it comes to fivethirtyeight.com.







OK, raise your hand if you remember all the hullabaloo when the Virginia Military Institute was forced to admit women beginning in 1997. I had just moved from Virginia the year before, when the case was decided by the Supreme Court.

The howling that came from graduates of VMI was enough to make one think that if women set foot on VMI's campus, the entire structure of the U.S. military, indeed the very fabric of the nation's soul, would be torn asunder.

Now we learn that:

[W]hat has followed, the school's current leaders say, is unexpected academic progress. Admission decisions are more selective than a decade ago. SAT scores are up. A rejuvenated faculty is building a national reputation for undergraduate research.


I hate it when that happens.






This is an interesting perspective on this past Sunday's National Equality March:

In the weeks leading up to the National Equality March -- held in Washington this past Sunday -- I found myself in the awkward position, for a straight person, of defending same-sex marriage rights to gay people who hated the whole idea with a passion.

Half the pleasure of being gay, explained my irritated interlocutors, is running wild. Maybe more than half.





I know, I know, we're supposed to just move on. The Bush Administration is over, done with. But the hits just keep coming. And once someone tells me how the current Republican party is any different from the Bush administration, then I'll let it go. [Hint: They're not.] Until then, one more fsckup:

The Bush administration Environmental Protection Agency actually reached the conclusion back in 2008 that climate change was a threat to humans. They just decided not to let anyone know about it.





I bought a one-terabyte hard drive last year, intending to use it for storage and backup. For someone who still has some floppy disks [soft floppies] lying around, that's a mind-bogglingly gigantic amount of storage space. Nevertheless, I'm using it, and the nice thing about it is that it's enough space. That is, while I've used a nice chunk of it, I'm also not at all worried about running out. I've never really been in that position before.

Facebook uses one petabyte just to store users' pictures. And now, companies are complaining that universities are ill-equipped to handle the increased data that's flowing into our world.

The amount of data is really just staggering.





This story (free registration required) makes my ramblings from last week even funnier:

Gone are the hot breakfasts in most dorms and the pastries at Widener Library. Varsity athletes are no longer guaranteed free sweat suits, and just this week came the jarring news that professors will go without cookies at faculty meetings.

By Harvard standards, these are hard times. Not Dickensian hard times, but with the value of its endowment down by almost 30 percent, the world’s richest university is learning to live with less.

The Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard’s largest division, has cut about $75 million from its budget in recent months and is planning more. With the cuts extending beyond hiring and salary freezes to measures that affect what students eat, where they study and other parts of their daily routine, the euphoria of fall in Harvard Yard is dampened.

Pardon me while I dry some tears.

I'm really tired of reading stories about how hard this Great Recession is on the privileged, elite, upper-crust. Give me a break.

I will say, though, that everyone seems to be piling on now:

Harvard University is known for providing its undergraduates with an unexpectedly high number of graduate assistants as teachers rather than professors because, apparently, the profs are too busy with more important things than teaching.

Now those poor kids can’t get a hot breakfast, a near tragedy that has just become the subject of numerous media accounts. Why is this, at a school where tuition is $33,696 for undergraduates this year and the total package (including room, board and student services fee) is $48,868?




The Beer of the Week is:

Meantime Brewing I had originally planned only to highlight American-made beer, and even within that I had planned to stick to so-called craft beer. But then I came across a beer place on Topsail Island in North Carolina that had a selection of a few hundred beers.

It reminded me of a couple of things. The first was that it's always amazing what you find in out-of-the-way places. The second was how much I liked Meantime beers. Not all of them. Once again, I had reviewed a few of these beers for my class: The Coffee Porter, Red Ale, and Chocolate Stout.

While I hadn't much liked the first two, the Chocolate Stout was incredible. But the place on Topsail had the Meantime Coffee Porter, so I figured I'd try it again. Oddly, this was much better in a bottle thousands of miles away than it was on tap a few miles from the brewery. Good stuff.

One cool thing about the Meantime Brewery is that it sits at on the Greenwich line. And they give coordinates for finding the pubs that carry their beer. It's a cool little gimmick.

Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 10/09/2009 12:01:00 PM
This is a wonderful analysis of what a university finds important, and valuable. A nice follow-up to my piece from earlier in the week:

In 1990, Harvard had an endowment of about $4.7-billion. That was still a lot of money, about $7.7-billion in today's dollars. Only five other universities have that much money now. Over the next two decades the pile grew to colossal heights, $36.9-billion by mid-2008.

Harvard spent the money on many things. But not a dollar went to increasing the number of undergraduates it chose to bless with a Harvard education. In 1990 the university welcomed slightly more than 1,600 students to its freshman class. In 2008, $32-billion later, it enrolled slightly more than 1,600 freshmen.

One thing to note about this analysis. Harvard didn't exactly have the money "dumped into its lap." That is, Harvard didn't have $5 billion one day, and $37 billion the next. The money grew over time, and Harvard couldn't have known that the investment would grow in the way it did.

Still, it does say something about core university values. Harvard still has the chance to expand its student body, and, as the article notes, make a concerted effort to recruit more students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. But I'll not hold my breath.







Going on the job market was hard. I was lucky to have experienced the AHA for several years before "going out," so I was somewhat prepared. Still, it wasn't fun. Was my c.v. in good shape? Had I published well, or often? I've often said that since I've now sat on hiring committees, and therefore been on both sides of the table, I simultaneously can't believe I ever got a job, and also cannot believe I didn't get one sooner.

Then there's this to worry about:

Given that it seems to be common wisdom that publications are helpful, two anecdotes I heard in the past week or so scare me a little bit. Both anecdotes are about departments that were searching or are planning a search. Both departments see their department as mainly a teaching department, but they do have research requirements (I think 3/3 or 3/2 loads). Also, according to both anecdotes, these departments consider publications in top journals as counting against a candidate!

So, hang on a sec. Publish and perish, publish or perish? What to do, what to do?




Nicely said.




Coming out isn't easy at any age. I can't even imagine the hell these kids go through (free registration required).



Look for a new semi-regular feature to start up here at Progressive Historians in the near future.




A revised edition of On The Origin of Species is set to hit campuses. It's being promoted by a creationist group, and the "actor" Kirk Cameron is pimping up the volume. They have included a new frontspiece that attempts to "debunk" evolution because they seem to think that "science" blindly accepts Darwin as biblical revelation, so to speak.

Science debates Darwin and evolution all the time. These people live in a fantasy world.

The best part:

He said that universities need his edition of Origin of Species because professors today "are not allowed to mention God. If a professor believes in a creator, they are not allowed to mention it because it's religion." Asked if that was not an exaggeration, given that many professors of various faiths at a range of colleges and universities do talk about their belief in God, Comfort acknowledged that such discussion takes place, but said that it is banned as biology instruction.

The idea that God can't be mentioned in on-campus--even in biology--classes is utter fantasy. These people don't have the first idea of what goes on in a liberal arts institution. None.

But here's the real agenda:

The idea, according to the fund raising materials, is that top universities, which might not be thrilled at their students being given anti-evolution materials, will be unable to block the distribution of Darwin's writings. "Let's see if they try to ban Darwin's Origin of Species," it says.

There it is in a nutshell. They're looking for a university to ban their book so that they can shout "EEVUL LIBRULS!!!!!"

Did I mention that these people don't have the first idea of what goes on in a liberal arts institution?

Oh, also: It's On the Origin of Species. Getting the title correct gives you a bit more cred.



I had a student come up to me on the first day of class, a few weeks ago, who said "Now, it's not that I can't read, but . . .

Trust me, there isn't anything that comes after those first words that can make the first part of the statement any better.



Something's definitely rotten in California, and as usual Bob Herbert nails it:

Berkeley is caught in a full-blown budget crisis with nothing much in the way of upside in sight. The school is trying to cope with what the chancellor, Robert Birgeneau, described as a “severe and rapid loss in funding” from the state, which has shortchanged Berkeley’s budget nearly $150 million this year, and cut more than $800 million from the higher education system as a whole.

This is like waving goodbye to the futures of untold numbers of students. Chancellor Birgeneau denounced the state’s action as “a completely irresponsible disinvestment in the future of its public universities.”

(The chancellor was being kind. Anyone who has spent more than 10 minutes watching the chaos of California politicians trying to deal with fiscal and budgetary matters would consider “completely irresponsible” to be the mildest of possible characterizations.)



Along those lines, my state, like others, is undergoing massive budget cuts. There will be no raises for this year in our university--so we've been told many times by our president. Except for some of the higher-level administrators, natch, who scored some tens of thousands of dollars in raises. Oh, and the Athletic Director will get a raise that will make him the third-highest paid AD in our athletic conference. Plus he'll receive $25,000 per year for four years deposited into a tax-deferred retirement account. The athletics department is not self-supporting. And our football team is ranked about 118 our of 120 in the FBS, and has lost sixteen straight games.

There's priorities for ya. It'd be nice to see this where I live. But I'll not hold my breath.



The Illuminati are paying me. That's who. Try to stop it.



Astounding bravery:
Marek Edelman, a cardiologist who was the last surviving commander of the 1943 Warsaw ghetto uprising against the Germans, died Friday in Warsaw. He was 90.




Bravery, with grace.






It seems that more and more companies are deciding that responsible action on climate change means removing themselves from umbrella organizations like the Chamber of Commerce that lobby against reform.






And the beer of the week is: Carolina Brewing Company

These folks make really good beer, and they usually get good marks at Beer Advocate. OK, you're tired of hearing me say that, I know. I promise, I'll review a bad beer soon. But not this week.

I've previously reviewed a few of their beers for a class on the history of beer I was teaching. Those reviews include their Cottonwood Endo IPA, the Carolina Blonde, and the Low Down Brown Ale. I've yet to have a bad beer from the folks at Carolina.

The beer is not yet nationally available, as far as I can tell. But if you fly through the Charlotte airport, they have a pub at the end of Concourse D. Good stuff. The Carolina Blonde is epecially goood with nachos.


Labels: ,