by AndrewMc | 2/26/2010 11:01:00 AM
Hahahahahahahaha.

Welcome to Friday. Today is the birthday of the Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona, and the subway in New York City.

Follow me.



I've used this space a few times to highlight the ongoing media debate about the value of a college degree. In fact, hardly a week goes by without one article or another questioning whether or not a college degree has value.

Most of that discussion, as I've said in the past, implies that the value of a college degree is in the monetary reward of whatever job a student gets after they graduate. Personally, I feel that this completely ignores the point of a college education.

The point is to prepare people to be active and engaged citizens of this republic. For that, students need to have a liberal arts education with a core curriculum that exposes them to a broad range of ideas and allows them to discuss and debate those ideas in an open and unfiltered manner.

It also requires that they grow and mature as people during their college education.

That's why this trend is not good:

First:
Dozens of public high schools in eight states will introduce a program next year allowing 10th graders who pass a battery of tests to get a diploma two years early and immediately enroll in community college.


And then:
In an era when college students commonly take longer than four years to get a bachelor's degree, some U.S. schools are looking anew at an old idea: slicing a year off their undergraduate programs to save families time and money.


This is "education as assembly line." Get students through as quickly as possible so they can get a job. It completely ignores the role of higher education as a facilitator of an educated citizenry. It's education on the cheap, with the main goal being to save time and money, and to bring out a product [a diploma] quickly and efficiently.

Education isn't supposed to be quick and efficient.




Majoring in sex, drugs, rock 'n roll.




I'm going to be the pilot on the next shuttle mission. Then I'm going to get a job as a programmer at Apple. After that, I think I'll take command of the 101st Airborne division. To wrap up a busy career, I think maybe I'll conduct cancer research at Scripps Hospital. Maybe I'll get my friend Bob Sacamano to help. No problem.




I have several students who self-identify as Tea-Partiers. My surprise is that I don't have more. In fact, the only good thing about the general apathy of of my students is that it means that the College Republicans don't do very much.

I realize that Teabaggers need to have a populace that is as uneducated as possible. Well, let me go back for a second. Tea Partiers themselves seem to be pretty well educated. But those are the self-styled leaders of the party. What they need is for voters to be as uneducated as possible. How else will they get them to swallow all the crap that comes out of the mouths of people like Mark Williams.

So, their non-stop meddling is bad enough. But this is more worrisome.

As if the recession had not given community college advocates enough to worry about, some fear that the anti-tax sentiment stirred by Tea Party activists could endanger their federal, state and local funding.

One Tea Party group in New Jersey is questioning Warren County Community College's plans to open a satellite campus, meant to accommodate the institution's burgeoning enrollment in outlying areas and free up space on its main campus. As required by New Jersey law, half of the $7.3 million bond to buy and renovate a commercial building for the new campus would be paid from an existing pool of state funds. The remainder, officials say, would be paid for by leasing additional space in the renovated building to interested tenants.






This seems like a "duh?" moment, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised when it happens.

A Montgomery County teacher has agreed to apologize to a 13-year-old student whom he reprimanded and sent to the office for twice refusing to stand during the Pledge of Allegiance, said a lawyer who represents the student.





It's about time.





We're reading Rick Perlstein's "Who Owns the Sixties" in class this week, so this piece at Salon is especially timely. I'm intrigued by the idea of the Teabaggers as "countercultural," especially given the unceasing argument that America is essentially a conservative nation. Me, I'd go with labeling them "disaffected loonies." But that's me.

Still, there's something to be said for the idea that

Street theater. Communes. Manifestoes. Denunciations of "the system." The counterculture is back. Only this time it's on the right.

Political factions that are out of power have a choice. They can form a counter-establishment or a counterculture. A counter-establishment (a term that Sidney Blumenthal used to describe the neoconservatives in the 1970s) seeks to return to power by reassuring voters that it is sober and responsible. A counter-establishment publishes policy papers and holds conferences and its members endure their exile in think tanks and universities.

In contrast, a counterculture refuses to acknowledge the legitimacy of the rules of the game that it has lost. Instead of moving toward the center, the counterculture heads for the fringes. Like a cult, it creates its own parallel reality, seceding from a corrupt and wicked society into morally and politically pure enclaves.





The words "disaffected loonies" doesn't even begin to cover this.

THE .50 CALIBER Bushmaster bolt action rifle is a serious weapon. The model that Pvt. 1st Class Lee Pray is saving up for has a 2,500-yard range and comes with a Mark IV scope and an easy-load magazine. When the 25-year-old drove me to a mall in Watertown, New York, near the Fort Drum Army base, he brought me to see it in its glass case—he visits it periodically, like a kid coveting something at the toy store. It'll take plenty of military paychecks to cover the $5,600 price tag, but he considers the Bushmaster essential in his preparations to take on the US government when it declares martial law.

His belief that that day is imminent has led Pray to a group called Oa/th Kee/pers, one of the fastest-growing "patriot" organizations on the right.


Here's the main clue that these people are way more "anti-Obama" than they are concerned with defending the Constitution:

Most of the men's gripes revolve around policies that began under President Bush but didn't scare them so much at the time. "Too many conservatives relied on Bush's character and didn't pay attention," founder Rho/des told me. "Only now, with Obama, do they worry and see what has been done. I trusted Bush to only go after the terrorists. But what do you think can happen down the road when they say, 'I think you are a threat to the nation?'"



This is the typical behavior of people who support dictators: Absolute power is OK when my allies exercise it.

The test for handing power to someone, anyone, is "would I be OK if my political opponents had the same power?" If the answer is "no" then you don't do it. It's simple.




I love the idea of this:

It is a grand vision: a global college with no tuition, accessible to anyone with an Internet connection.

When the higher education entrepreneur Shai Reshef laid out his ambitious plan to build a free university that would use modern technology to spread the promise of a college degree to all corners of the earth, he got an enthusiastic reaction from some high-profile institutions. The United Nations has backed the venture. So has Yale Law School’s Information Society Project. Reshef and his lieutenants also like to mention the many letters of support and offers to pitch in from professors worldwide.


It gets right to the very ideal of a liberal education: it should be open to all. But the hard reality is that a liberal education is subject to the market. Universities raise tuition, loans are hard to get, and states generally have little interest in funding higher education in a meaningful way. Too bad.

And,
Questions about the so-called University of the People abounded: How do you build quality programs without charging tuition? How effective would the project’s peer-to-peer pedagogical model be in classrooms of students from vastly different cultural and educational traditions? Who would accredit such an operation at a time when the perceived value -- even necessity -- of a postsecondary education is ascendant in virtually every country? Reshef’s heart seems to be in the right place. But is his head?


I don't know that this thing will succeed. After all, many universities already provide free online classes to anyone with a computer.

We'll see.




In class today we are tasting a range of chocolate stouts. Young's was the first I ever had. It reminds me of liquid chocolate cake. Great flavor--it's deep and mellow.

It falls into the "Spice, Herb, or Vegetable Beer" category for the Beer Judge Certification Program. From a judging standpoint this category is wide-open, and it gives brewers a great deal of flexibility.

Have a good weekend.


Labels: ,

 
by AndrewMc | 2/19/2010 12:01:00 PM
Whew! It's been a while. Between the weird pressure of preparing for the new semester, and a new job (well, a new job within an old job), and a few other things, I've been absolutely slaughtered.

Lucky you; I'm back. And Friday Ramblings are, too. Follow me.





Conservatives will tell you there's no right to privacy. What about this?

According to the filings in Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District (PA) et al, the laptops issued to high-school students in the well-heeled Philly suburb have webcams that can be covertly activated by the schools' administrators, who have used this facility to spy on students and even their families. The issue came to light when the Robbins's child was disciplined for "improper behavior in his home" and the Vice Principal used a photo taken by the webcam as evidence. The suit is a class action, brought on behalf of all students issued with these machines.


That's just ridiculous. And I'm wondering who the Einstein was who sat down with the IT people and said "Oh, by the way, set the laptop up so I can look into the students' houses when I want to."

If true, that's about as stupid as it gets.




There was a time when the United States actually prosecuted people for this sort of thing.

Nowadays we apparently don't think it's a crime.





I'm sorry, but are you kidding me? Female genital mutilation in Iraq? The look on her face says it all.

Disgusting. Even more disgusting that it's occurring in a country we've occupied for all these years.





Here's something interesting, as reported at IHE and Huffington Post:

Someone is making a documentary that is apparently highly critical of the late Senator Edward Kennedy. It will be from the same producer—a man with close ties to prominent conservatives—who makes the series 24.

Some liberal historians are angry, and have begun a website to petition the History Channel not to air the program.

I understand their issue. If the History Channel airs the programs, it will be seen by millions of people, especially college students. We'll spend years, if not decades, trying to correct the misinformation out there. In some ways, the History Channel is becoming the first draft of history.

Funny thing is, while that website asks for signatures on a petition, and for monetary donations to the cause, I couldn't find anywhere that it actually links to the offending script in order to allow readers to decide for themselves whether or not the script is as offensive as they claim.

Those folks may be right, but there's no way I'm signing a petition or giving you money if I can't see what it is you're objecting to.




You know what I like about South Carolina? There's never any shortage of teh crazy.

South Carolina will no longer recognize U.S. currency as legal tender, if State Rep. Mike Pitts has his way.

Pitts, a fourth-term Republican from Laurens, introduced legislation earlier this month that would ban what he calls “the unconstitutional substitution of Federal Reserve Notes for silver and gold coin” in South Carolina.

If the bill were to become law, South Carolina would no longer accept or use anything other than silver and gold coins as a form of payment for any debt, meaning paper money would be out in the Palmetto State.


Shades of nullification, eh?






Want to know why history matters? Look no further than this article in the New York Times Magazine. It's frightening.

[Texas School Board member Don] McLeroy moved that Margaret Sanger, the birth-control pioneer, be included because she “and her followers promoted eugenics,” that language be inserted about Ronald Reagan’s “leadership in restoring national confidence” following Jimmy Carter’s presidency and that students be instructed to “describe the causes and key organizations and individuals of the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.” The injection of partisan politics into education went so far that at one point another Republican board member burst out in seemingly embarrassed exasperation, “Guys, you’re rewriting history now!” Nevertheless, most of McLeroy’s proposed amendments passed by a show of hands.


The one thing that gives me some kind of cold, cold comfort is that state budgets are so bad right now that school boards may turn to more online sources, and away from publishers. The influence of the Texas School Board may simply hasten that, leaving Texas as even more of a backwoods, Neanderthal relic of pre-modern thinking.




Here's a nice piece on the history of slavery at Mammoth Cave.




Just as the punditocracy begins to whine that we're killing too many terrorists, and therefore ruining the war on terrorism . . . .

. . . . hold on. Seriously?! Am I really reading that Obama's version of the War on Terror(™) sucks because he's killing them? The only thing more screwy than that is that Democrats aren't on every single talk show saying "You're kidding, right? They don't want us to kill terrorists? Who's side are they on, anyway?"

OK, anyway. Where was I? Oh yeah.

Just as the punditocracy begins to whine that we're killing too many terrorists, and therefore ruining the war on terrorism, we hear of some major victories.

A top Taliban commander in Pakistan has been captured (which might have been lagniappe), as has another in Oman, and another in Pakistan.

This adds to many others killed in various kinds of strikes. And it seems to be working.




As if college being more expensive wasn't hard enough, now it's becoming harder to get a loan.




Well, if they can't get a loan to go, perhaps there are other incentives for the nation's increasingly-endangered male college students.

In all seriousness though, more people are paying attention to the increasing gender gap in colleges.




This is moderately funny.

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – In the wake of his comments about the earthquake in Haiti, televangelist Pat Robertson has become a “public relations nightmare” and a “gynormous embarrassment to me, personally,” God said today.


Except that the "ironic interviews with god" genre has already been done so well, that even now it's a hard act to top.




OK, this is good news on the progressive front:

Washington, D.C. – Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, praised an independent committee at the Department of Defense for adding emergency contraception (EC) to the list of medications made available to servicemembers overseas. Approximately 350,000 women serve in the military or depend on military facilities for their health care abroad.


But I have to say, when this is the good news we're celebrating—that we'll graciously allow women to purchase contraception—we're probably losing the battle.




There's a difference between climate and weather.




The proliferation of free online courses is an interesting trend.






Beer of the week:


You haven't heard of Brew Dog beer? Not surprising. Their beers are mainly available in the UK, and even there are premium beers, and not widely available in the U.S. I've had their Paradox Imperial Stout and the Hardcore IPA.

I enjoyed both. But the article about their Sink the Bismark beer at Huffington Post really caught my eye.


Labels: ,

 
by Joel Tscherne | 2/15/2010 02:14:00 PM

Every year, a member of the United States Senate reads Washington's Farewell Address on Presidents Day. Yet, it seems obvious that nobody really listens to it, given their willingness to ignore it.



Early in the address, Washington argued the importance of unity to the country. He believed that the main purpose of disunity is to gain power and take control. He particularly warns about obstructionists who try to weaken government in the name of the people as a way to place power into the hands of unjust leaders.

Of course, Washington also discusses the dangers of political parties. Factions consistently try to gain power instead of promoting liberty. He disdains the distractions from governing caused by political parties. I can't help thinking that this must be a tough section to repeat today.

Political leaders love to state the importance of listening to the founding fathers, but they invariably ignore opinions that don't jibe with their desire for power.

Labels: , , , ,

 
by Winter Rabbit | 2/09/2010 03:13:00 PM
Thank you Mr. Olbermann, just thank you.







But our winner, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. Where are you guys? Three major Native American reservations in South Dakota, particularly the Cheyenne River Reservation, have been buried under snow and ice with major power failures, for two weeks.







Power lines down, thousands of other Lakota and other tribes people, already face 75 to 85% unemployment, before a blizzard and an ice storm that added six inches of ice weight to utility poles – hit. Two weeks since those lines were knocked down and most of the electricity went with it. They managed to get the water turned back on at Cheyenne River, unfortunately most of the water goes into a pipe system that failed during the storm. The pipes are broken. With the wind chill it was minus 19 there today. What we find out about this on the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs – some means of donating to the affected tribes, means of underwriting the energy companies now distributing propane tanks by hand? An emergency hearing on a crisis there? Nothing. There’s a committee meeting Thursday to discuss regular business. The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs – AWOL. Today’s worst persons in the world.






Mr. Olbermann, I wrote you a letter a long time ago after your Special Comment about the Military Commissions Act, that maybe you were the next Edward Murrow. Since that time, I definitely say yes, with your own style and voice. The ironic thing is, after the MCA passed I was scared and a lot of others were too. Speaking for myself, I needed someone to have the courage to speak out about it. What’s different about this is, while the Democratic Party was bullied into the MCA that was “redrafted” at the last minute, the primary culprit here is apathy, not fear.

Where else could they get by with this?


The planned uranium mine site in the southern Black Hills can impact four aquifers. Powertech, Inc. USA plans to begin uranium extraction in 2011 and operate for 15 years in the permit area of 10,580 acres located in Dewey and Burdock Counties, north of Edgemont, SD.




Or this?



http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/archive/80412587.html

On Dec. 4 an action was taken against Crow Creek tribal land near my district that shook the absolute foundations of Indian law all the way back to the 1800s. Yet, few people were in the small room in Highmore, S.D. to see this monumental action and few other tribes even know it has taken place. Any tribe with land should shutter with the magnitude of what this precedent could mean for themselves or their individual tribal members. The Internal Revenue Service collected against 7,100 acres – 11 square miles – of Indian owned land in Hyde County, S.D. This particular parcel was part of the original Crow Creek treaty boundaries, but the treaty was subsequently broken and this land was sold to LeMaster. Interestingly enough, our tribe was able to use settlement money from another federal land taking to purchase this land back in 1998.

I don’t want to speculate any more on as you so said, “There’s a committee meeting Thursday to discuss regular business.” However, sadly this is “business as usual” from my point of view. What isn’t, is your covering it with conviction and integrity. Thank you Mr. Olbermann, thank you from the bottom of my heart. If the people get some more help, they can better fight for their land.

Please also see "Keith Olbermann Names Senate Committee of Indian Affairs to His WORST List" for some things you can do to help!

Labels: , ,

 
by AndrewMc | 2/09/2010 05:00:00 AM
Welcome to Tuesday. What ails ya?




Labels: ,